2008-Jun-20
The information on this page is not intended to be a comprehensive reference source.
The information examples on this page are presented in an attempt to explain to naive, or uninformed NON-muslims, the 'philosophy' of ISLAM, and to expose the 'world-view' of devout muslims.
Which is...
Topics on this page....
There are no 'moderate'
muslims - ANYWHERE.
ISLAM is a system of laws.
ISLAM is a violent political movement,
which uses 'Religion' as a cloak, or veil,
to 'approach' its intended victims.
ISLAM is a system of laws.
ISLAM is a violent political movement,
which uses 'Religion' as a cloak, or veil,
to 'approach' its intended victims.
The information on this page is not intended to be a comprehensive reference source.
The information examples on this page are presented in an attempt to explain to naive, or uninformed NON-muslims, the 'philosophy' of ISLAM, and to expose the 'world-view' of devout muslims.
Which is...
- To
those [culturally stronger] communities which it approaches,
ISLAM [while it is still weaker] quietly insists,
and assures them, that ISLAM is a tolerant and peaceful philosophy, but,
- Within
its own ranks,
- While ISLAM is weak and with little influence, ISLAM promotes a 'philosophy' of deception, falsehood, lies, towards the 'unbelievers'. All-the-while seeking to increase its political influence within a host community.
- When ISLAM becomes politically
stronger within any host community, it
will then use, and promote violence, by those
people who claim to be devout muslims, against
those people identified as 'unbelievers', and 'enemies of ISLAM'. The
use of this political
violence is intended to
create fear, and 'respect' for ISLAM / muslims, among the
'unbelievers'. This increasing stream of community violence [often
initiated by muslims themselves], is always portrayed as 'oppression',
'racism', 'discrimination', and such, against ['victim'] muslims. And
has
the effect that muslim community spokesmen will then demand, and
receive, yet further community concessions, to appease an increasingly
vociferous group of muslims within the wider community. As the level of
political influence of muslims, in the wider community, increases,
the level of
violence against all things 'non-muslim', and un-ISLAMIC, will only increase. example1,
example2
THIS [below],
is the 'integration' into Western society,
which devout muslims in the UK,
are teaching to their children...
....That muslim children in the UK should exercise their right,
of 'freedom of speech', ....with ISLAMIC pride.
[i.e. without apology, or concession to 'unbelievers']
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/cartoon-protest12.jpg
London, Feb 2006
is the 'integration' into Western society,
which devout muslims in the UK,
are teaching to their children...
....That muslim children in the UK should exercise their right,
of 'freedom of speech', ....with ISLAMIC pride.
[i.e. without apology, or concession to 'unbelievers']
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/cartoon-protest12.jpg
London, Feb 2006
AND THEN, WHEN THESE
CHILDREN GROW
UP???...
Words, not from the Koran!....
....These 'aggrieved' young muslim men grow up enraged, against secular society.
Because ISLAM has taught them, that they are discriminated against,
by a secular justice system [a system of one law for all], and discriminated against within secular society.
So, instead of being content with, one law for all.
These muslims demand, for themselves,
the exclusive 'muslim rights', enshrined within Sharia law,
which will deliver, 'Justice for Muslims'.
London, 2008
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2171300/Young-Muslims-%27are-turning-to-extremism%27.html
Another example, of young muslims exercising their rights of 'freedom of speech', here.
Words, not from the Koran!....
Train
up a child in the way he should go:
and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
and when he is old, he will not depart from it.
Proverbs 22:6
....These 'aggrieved' young muslim men grow up enraged, against secular society.
Because ISLAM has taught them, that they are discriminated against,
by a secular justice system [a system of one law for all], and discriminated against within secular society.
So, instead of being content with, one law for all.
These muslims demand, for themselves,
the exclusive 'muslim rights', enshrined within Sharia law,
which will deliver, 'Justice for Muslims'.
London, 2008
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2171300/Young-Muslims-%27are-turning-to-extremism%27.html
Another example, of young muslims exercising their rights of 'freedom of speech', here.
Topics on this page....
THERE ARE NO
MODERATE MUSLIMS
Peaceful ISLAM - ???
THE CLAIM - 'Muslims only ever resort to violent actions, in defence of ISLAM' - ???
The treatment of muslim apostates
Real world EX-muslims, explain real world ISLAM
The 'Ummah' - the worldwide muslim community of believers
Sharia law
'Dawa' - the invitation to ISLAM
'The House of War'
The present [2008] worldwide moves underway to outlaw all criticism, and scrutiny of ISLAM
Peaceful ISLAM - ???
THE CLAIM - 'Muslims only ever resort to violent actions, in defence of ISLAM' - ???
The treatment of muslim apostates
Real world EX-muslims, explain real world ISLAM
The 'Ummah' - the worldwide muslim community of believers
Sharia law
'Dawa' - the invitation to ISLAM
'The House of War'
The present [2008] worldwide moves underway to outlaw all criticism, and scrutiny of ISLAM
[link]
THERE ARE NO 'MODERATE' MUSLIMS
.....AND THERE IS NO
'MODERATE' ISLAM
THE MOMENT A MUSLIM IS IDENTIFIED AS A 'MODERATE', WITHIN 'HIS OWN' COMMUNITY,
....HE IS DECLARED TAKFIR [unbeliever], BY AUTHORITY OF ISLAMIC LAW.
The term, 'Moderate' muslim, is in fact, an oxymoron.
According to ISLAM itself [and its religious texts], the moment any muslim expresses genuine friendship towards an unbeliever - he becomes one!
A muslim who espouses the tolerance of unbelievers, the tolerance of their societies, and the tolerance of their un-ISLAMIC lifestyles - becomes a NON-muslim.
The moment a muslim abandons the main tenets of ISLAM [i.e. intolerance of all things un-ISLAMIC], he is deemed [by ISLAMIC religious texts, and devout muslims] to be a NON-muslim.
He is declared Takfir [see also, treatment of muslim apostates].
And as an apostate he must be killed, for his 'betrayal' of ISLAM.
Do muslims actually have any respect, or tolerance for 'unbelievers' ???
The evidence is, that when speaking candidly among themselves, muslims speak of Christians disparagingly, disrespectfully...
- In one example, a UK muslim cleric describes Christians as "...worse than the muck", on muslim shoes.
- In another example, an
Australian born
muslim
cleric [speaking to
a muslim audience] describes Christians
and all non-muslims as Kuffar,
as
'filth', "Kaffir
is the worst word ever written, a sign of infidelity, disbelief, filth,
a sign of dirt."
....When his assertions were later, widely publicised, the muslim
cleric then claimed his remarks were 'misunderstood'.
Why do muslims resort to this falsehood, lies, deceit???
see... Taqiyya
REFERENCES....
From the horses mouth....
'One
Cannot Be a Muslim, and Secular'
Those are the words of the *current* [2007] Turkish PM....
article....
May 23, 2007
Turkish PM Erdogan in Speech During Term As Istanbul Mayor Attacks Turkey's Constitution, Describing it As 'A Huge Lie':
'Sovereignty Belongs Unconditionally and Always To Allah';
'One Cannot Be a Muslim, and Secular'
http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD159607
Turkish PM Erdogan in Speech During Term As Istanbul Mayor Attacks Turkey's Constitution, Describing it As 'A Huge Lie':
'Sovereignty Belongs Unconditionally and Always To Allah';
'One Cannot Be a Muslim, and Secular'
http://memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD159607
The Koran instructs muslims, that ,
"Unbelievers
are unto you open enemies." [comment... justifying, 'sanctifying', the hatred of
non-muslims]
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/004.qmt.html#004.101
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/004.qmt.html#004.101
The Koran instructs muslims, that non-muslims only wish to corrupt, and ruin muslims. [comment... inciting hatred towards non-muslims]
The Koran instructs muslims, that,
"Fighting [against
non-muslims] is prescribed for you,
and [if] ye dislike
it.....Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
[comment... fighting
the
non-muslims, to bring Allah's way, is an obligation.]
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.216
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/002.qmt.html#002.216
The Koran commands that, muslims must,
"....take
not the Jews and the
Christians for your friends....
......he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them." [is an apostate! Two UK examples]
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/005.qmt.html#005.051
......he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them." [is an apostate! Two UK examples]
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/005.qmt.html#005.051
TAKFIR...
"....takfir or takfeer is the practice of
declaring unbeliever or kafir (pl. kuffār), an individual or a
group previously
considered Muslim."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfir
....a 'Kuffar' [the muslim derogatory term, for an 'unbeliever'],
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuffar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfir
....a 'Kuffar' [the muslim derogatory term, for an 'unbeliever'],
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuffar
Dictionary definition,
oxymoron
/%QksI"mO;rQn/
· n. a figure of speech or expressed idea in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction.
– DERIVATIVES oxymoronic adj.
– ORIGIN C17: from Gk oxumZron, neut. (used as n.) of oxumZros ‘pointedly foolish’, from oxus ‘sharp’ + mZros ‘foolish’.
· n. a figure of speech or expressed idea in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction.
– DERIVATIVES oxymoronic adj.
– ORIGIN C17: from Gk oxumZron, neut. (used as n.) of oxumZros ‘pointedly foolish’, from oxus ‘sharp’ + mZros ‘foolish’.
Creed of the sword
Mark Durie
September 23, 2006
.....the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdel Aziz al-Sheikh, issued a statement on the official Saudi news service, defending Muslims' divine right to resort to violence: "The spread of Islam has gone through several phases, secret and then public, in Mecca and Medina. God then authorised the faithful to defend themselves and to fight against those fighting them, which amounts to a right legitimised by God. This ... is quite reasonable, and God will not hate it."
Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric also explained that war was never Islam's ancient founder, the prophet Mohammed's, first choice: "He gave three options: either accept Islam, or surrender and pay tax, and they will be allowed to remain in their land, observing their religion under the protection of Muslims." Thus, according to the Grand Mufti, the third option of violence against non-Muslims was only a last resort, if they refused to convert or surrender peacefully to the armies of Islam.
.......At the beginning, in Mohammed's Meccan period, when he was weaker and his followers few, passages of the Koran encouraged peaceful relations and avoidance of conflict: "Invite (all) to the way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious." (16:125)
Later, after persecution and emigration to Medina in the first year of the Islamic calendar, authority was given to engage in warfare for defensive purposes only: "Fight in the path of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits, for God does not love transgressors." (2:190)
As the Muslim community grew stronger and conflict with its neighbours did not abate, further revelations expanded the licence for waging war, until in Sura 9, regarded as one of the last chapters to be revealed, it is concluded that war against non-Muslims could be waged more or less at any time and in any place to extend the dominance of Islam.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20460114-601,00.html
Mark Durie
September 23, 2006
.....the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdel Aziz al-Sheikh, issued a statement on the official Saudi news service, defending Muslims' divine right to resort to violence: "The spread of Islam has gone through several phases, secret and then public, in Mecca and Medina. God then authorised the faithful to defend themselves and to fight against those fighting them, which amounts to a right legitimised by God. This ... is quite reasonable, and God will not hate it."
Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric also explained that war was never Islam's ancient founder, the prophet Mohammed's, first choice: "He gave three options: either accept Islam, or surrender and pay tax, and they will be allowed to remain in their land, observing their religion under the protection of Muslims." Thus, according to the Grand Mufti, the third option of violence against non-Muslims was only a last resort, if they refused to convert or surrender peacefully to the armies of Islam.
.......At the beginning, in Mohammed's Meccan period, when he was weaker and his followers few, passages of the Koran encouraged peaceful relations and avoidance of conflict: "Invite (all) to the way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious." (16:125)
Later, after persecution and emigration to Medina in the first year of the Islamic calendar, authority was given to engage in warfare for defensive purposes only: "Fight in the path of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits, for God does not love transgressors." (2:190)
As the Muslim community grew stronger and conflict with its neighbours did not abate, further revelations expanded the licence for waging war, until in Sura 9, regarded as one of the last chapters to be revealed, it is concluded that war against non-Muslims could be waged more or less at any time and in any place to extend the dominance of Islam.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20460114-601,00.html
"...Omar Brooks ...declared it was imperative for Muslims [those
muslims living
in
the UK]
to “instil terror into the hearts of the kuffar” "
...al-Muhajiroun claimed [a UK based Jihadist group]: "Terrorism is a part of Islam" and
"Allah made it obligatory to prepare [for Jihad] and to terrify the enemy of Allah".
Additional Al-Muhajiroun source info... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Muhajiroun
".....If Islam was only spread by peaceful means,
what would the kuffaar have to be afraid of?"
Shaykh Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid
[ISLAMIC 'scholar', 'teacher', 'holy man', available to answer queries about ISLAMIC creed, online.]
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Shaykh+Muhammad+Salih+al-Munajjid&btnG=Search&meta=
to “instil terror into the hearts of the kuffar” "
...al-Muhajiroun claimed [a UK based Jihadist group]: "Terrorism is a part of Islam" and
"Allah made it obligatory to prepare [for Jihad] and to terrify the enemy of Allah".
Additional Al-Muhajiroun source info... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Muhajiroun
".....If Islam was only spread by peaceful means,
what would the kuffaar have to be afraid of?"
Shaykh Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid
[ISLAMIC 'scholar', 'teacher', 'holy man', available to answer queries about ISLAMIC creed, online.]
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Shaykh+Muhammad+Salih+al-Munajjid&btnG=Search&meta=
AN 'INTERFAITH' EVENT SPONSORED BY MUSLIMS....
Pointedly, 'moderate' ISLAM [is an illusion, a 'vapour', which] seemingly only flourishes inside non-muslim nations.
A fact underlined, by the facts of this next item....
June
22, 2008
Saudi-led "interfaith" meeting to be held in... Spain
There are several angles to the choice of Spain for the site of this "dialogue": One, obviously, is that it would be rather awkward to invite a large contingent of religious leaders to a place where they are forbidden from carrying bibles and other sacred texts, and from displaying religious symbols. And, of course, they certainly couldn't hold the meeting in Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina, since no non-Muslims are allowed there. That might lead to uncomfortable questions when one considers that Rome, Jerusalem, and other cities are open to all visitors.
......the most likely result of this occasion will be a joint statement asserting that all major religions are peaceful and condemn the killing of "innocents" (a term always left undefined so that the uninitiated will assume the best), and that Islam "respects" other religions, so the rest of the world should straighten up, fly right, and respect Islam, too, and stop identifying it with oppression and terrorist acts. Thus, one can hardly call the event a dialogue; a more accurate term is "interfaith monologue."
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/021481.php
Saudi-led "interfaith" meeting to be held in... Spain
There are several angles to the choice of Spain for the site of this "dialogue": One, obviously, is that it would be rather awkward to invite a large contingent of religious leaders to a place where they are forbidden from carrying bibles and other sacred texts, and from displaying religious symbols. And, of course, they certainly couldn't hold the meeting in Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina, since no non-Muslims are allowed there. That might lead to uncomfortable questions when one considers that Rome, Jerusalem, and other cities are open to all visitors.
......the most likely result of this occasion will be a joint statement asserting that all major religions are peaceful and condemn the killing of "innocents" (a term always left undefined so that the uninitiated will assume the best), and that Islam "respects" other religions, so the rest of the world should straighten up, fly right, and respect Islam, too, and stop identifying it with oppression and terrorist acts. Thus, one can hardly call the event a dialogue; a more accurate term is "interfaith monologue."
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/021481.php
Indeed, if the Saudis wish to
demonstrate ISLAMIC tolerance, why not hold their 'interfaith dialogue'
in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia???
Perhaps the Saudis could arrange for our 'interfaith dialogue' representatives, to all go, and visit the Kaaba???
And the Saudis can explain perhaps, why Christians [and other non-muslims] are treated so poorly in all of those nations, which are the bastions of ISLAM???
But i am sure that no-body [no non-muslim representatives] wishes to discuss issues such as these, ....it would be 'impolite'.
Perhaps the Saudis could arrange for our 'interfaith dialogue' representatives, to all go, and visit the Kaaba???
And the Saudis can explain perhaps, why Christians [and other non-muslims] are treated so poorly in all of those nations, which are the bastions of ISLAM???
But i am sure that no-body [no non-muslim representatives] wishes to discuss issues such as these, ....it would be 'impolite'.
[link]
Peaceful ISLAM - ???
MANY MUSLIMS MAKE THE CLAIM THAT....
'Muslims are peaceful people, and want to live in 'peace' with others [non-muslims].'
THE TROUBLE WITH THAT MUSLIM CLAIM IS....
It is a lie.
The problem is that ISLAM defines 'Peace', exclusively in ISLAMIC terms.
....and muslims rarely explain [to non-muslims], that by 'Peace', muslims mean a total surrender to Allah / ISLAM.
What devout muslims describe as a state of 'Peace' [with non-muslims], is that all non-muslims should, and must, surrender to the *political* authority of ISLAM / Sharia law.
....by conversion [preferred] to ISLAM, or submission [in every aspect of a non-muslims life] to ISLAMIC tenets, and rules.
....OR, DEVOUT MUSLIMS MAY, AND WILL ['justly'] KILL YOU FOR 'INSULTING' ISLAM!
TO ALL DEVOUT MUSLIMS...
'Peace' will only become apparent, when all people, everywhere, are subject to Sharia law.
REFERENCES....
The Hadith instructs,
"Allah
's Apostle said, " I have been
ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to
be worshipped but Allah,'...."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.196
The Koran instructs that, in Jihad, muslims must not compromise, and must show no mercy, do not seek Peace with Allah's enemy,
Those who reject Allah,
and hinder (men) from the Path of Allah, then die rejecting Allah,-
Allah will not forgive them.
Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good) deeds.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.034
34 & 35
Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good) deeds.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.034
34 & 35
An article, from an EX-muslim...
When Muslims say
"peace"...
We know Islam better than anyone else. We know the minds of Muslims. We know the inner recesses of their thoughts, because those were our own thoughts. We know exactly the terminologies that Muslims use and what they mean by them. Others don’t.
When Muslims say "peace", it means you submit to us so we let you live. Otherwise we will kill you.
When Muslims say we fight oppression, they mean we fight disbelief. You become an oppressor the moment you say I don’t want to be a Muslim.
When they say Islam does not allow killing innocent people, they mean those who have not yet rejected Islam. Once you reject their d’awa you are no more innocent.
When Muslims say Islam fights corruption, they mean freedom of thought. This is the greatest corruption as far as Islam is concerned.
When Muslims say Islam accepts Christianity and Judaism, they mean only the versions that were invented by Muhammad. All the Christians and the Jews who do not submit to Islam and want to interpret their religion in their own way are disbelievers and should be killed.....
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51021p2.htm
We know Islam better than anyone else. We know the minds of Muslims. We know the inner recesses of their thoughts, because those were our own thoughts. We know exactly the terminologies that Muslims use and what they mean by them. Others don’t.
When Muslims say "peace", it means you submit to us so we let you live. Otherwise we will kill you.
When Muslims say we fight oppression, they mean we fight disbelief. You become an oppressor the moment you say I don’t want to be a Muslim.
When they say Islam does not allow killing innocent people, they mean those who have not yet rejected Islam. Once you reject their d’awa you are no more innocent.
When Muslims say Islam fights corruption, they mean freedom of thought. This is the greatest corruption as far as Islam is concerned.
When Muslims say Islam accepts Christianity and Judaism, they mean only the versions that were invented by Muhammad. All the Christians and the Jews who do not submit to Islam and want to interpret their religion in their own way are disbelievers and should be killed.....
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51021p2.htm
Seek out the accounts and experiences, of real world EX-muslims, who know ISLAM far better than non-muslims ever can...
http://www.islam-watch.org/IW/aboutus.htm
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/
http://www.apostatesofislam.com/
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/
http://www.apostatesofislam.com/
[link]
THE CLAIM...
'Muslims
only ever resort to violent actions, in defence of ISLAM' - ???
Another common claim by devout muslims is that,
JIHAD.....
"........
Exists only when muslims are oppressed. That is, when a muslim is not
free to be a muslim........."
This last claim is a lie, and it is pure ISLAMIC propaganda.
The Jihad, is an obligation on every muslim.
And the purpose of the Jihad is to impose Sharia [Allah's law] upon the whole earth.
TO ALL DEVOUT MUSLIMS...
Those who 'interfere' with the spread of Sharia, are 'oppressing' muslims.
......and this, is ISLAM's 'line' [of victimhood] !!!
TO ALL DEVOUT MUSLIMS...
Those who impose equality in laws with non-muslims, or those who impose SECULAR [non-muslim] laws upon muslims are 'oppressing' muslims.
....only Allah's law [Sharia] is just to muslims.
It is a claimed 'oppression' when muslim immigrants in the West must live by [be made subject to] the same, secular laws as the native infidels, and not Sharia.
Famously, Dr Rowan Williams [Archbishop of Canterbury] seems to agree with UK muslims on this point.
In effect, muslims and the 'good' AoC, are both saying that the equality in UK law, of non-muslims and muslims, is 'discrimination' against muslims. ???
What sort of logic is that???
And this determination is in lock-step with Sharia law itself, which regards infidels, unbelievers, as 'guilty' people.
....and relative to all unbelievers, Sharia law itself, regards muslims as innocent people
REFERENCES....
Noble
Quran 2:190 Footnote:
...Jihad is holy fighting in Allahs Cause.......Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.
....on page 39 of the Noble Quran , translation by Muhammad Khan
...Jihad is holy fighting in Allahs Cause.......Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.
....on page 39 of the Noble Quran , translation by Muhammad Khan
The Hadith itself says....
Allah's
Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To
believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked,
"What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad
(religious fighting) in Allah's Cause."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025
Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.045
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025
Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.045
Those who reject Allah,
and hinder (men) from the Path of Allah, then die rejecting Allah,-
Allah will not forgive them.
Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good) deeds.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.034
34 & 35
Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost: for Allah is with you, and will never put you in loss for your (good) deeds.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.034
34 & 35
"....those who reject
Allah have no protector."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
see also....
July
27, 2006
Islamic Dictionary for Infidels
......the quest of converting the entire world to Islam is an immutable fixture of the Muslim worldview. Only if this task is accomplished, if the world has become a "Dar al-Islam," will it also be a "Dar a-Salam," or a house of peace.”
This strategy of deceiving non-Muslims by twisting words to conceal the real, Islamic agenda while Muslims are not yet strong enough to impose their will is sanctioned by Islamic texts.
.......“Lying is forbidden unless it is for necessity. In that case, the principle “necessity makes the unlawful permissible” applies.
Islamic Dictionary for Infidels
......the quest of converting the entire world to Islam is an immutable fixture of the Muslim worldview. Only if this task is accomplished, if the world has become a "Dar al-Islam," will it also be a "Dar a-Salam," or a house of peace.”
This strategy of deceiving non-Muslims by twisting words to conceal the real, Islamic agenda while Muslims are not yet strong enough to impose their will is sanctioned by Islamic texts.
.......“Lying is forbidden unless it is for necessity. In that case, the principle “necessity makes the unlawful permissible” applies.
[Comment... i.e. 'We muslims do evil things, so that good
may
come. So, yes of course, in our hands, doing 'evil' against the
'unbeliever', is doing
good.'
Yes, that, precisely describes the M.O. [modus operandi] of ISLAM, and the contorted ISLAMIC 'morality' - towards all non-muslim persons.]
Yes, that, precisely describes the M.O. [modus operandi] of ISLAM, and the contorted ISLAMIC 'morality' - towards all non-muslim persons.]
.......Contemporary
Muslim theologians
such as Yusuf Al-Qaradawi,
“spiritual”
leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and popular Al-Jazeera television
personality, hailed as a
moderate voice by some in the West,.......argues that in modern
war there are no civilians,
as all sectors of society aid the efforts if the country is involved in
confrontation with Muslims in some way. Which also means that all non-Muslim citizens become
legitimate targets of Islamic attacks.
Qaradawi says:
“It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of people of Dar Al-Harb [the Domain of Disbelief where the battle for the domination of Islam should be waged] is not protected…in modern war.....”
.......subjugation of non-Muslims to religious apartheid and second class citizenship in their own country is part and parcel of sharia, Islamic law.
.......Muslims believe that expansion through war is not aggression but a fulfillment of the Qur’anic command to spread Islam as a way to peace. The resort to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurub (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of "opening" the world to Islam...
.......Unbelievers who stand in the way, creating obstacles for the da’wa, are blamed for this state of war, for the da’wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it. In other words, those who resist Islam cause wars.....
......It’s “oppression” when Muslim immigrants in the West must live by the same, secular laws as the native infidels, not sharia, and “injustice” in the end refers to pretty much all societies not subjugated to obedience to the will of Allah. “Injustice” can thus be used to describe all non-Islamic systems, for instance Western democracy.
......it is not seen as aggression or war when Muslims attack non-Muslims. On the contrary, it is seen as aggression when non-Muslims resist the Islamization of their lands and thus “place obstacles in the way” of the spread of Islam.
.....Since a refusal to submit to sharia is a rebellion against Allah, the very existence of non-Muslim communities can be viewed as an act of aggression.
http://wolfgangbruno.blogspot.com/2006/07/islamic-dictionary-for-infidels.html
Qaradawi says:
“It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of people of Dar Al-Harb [the Domain of Disbelief where the battle for the domination of Islam should be waged] is not protected…in modern war.....”
.......subjugation of non-Muslims to religious apartheid and second class citizenship in their own country is part and parcel of sharia, Islamic law.
.......Muslims believe that expansion through war is not aggression but a fulfillment of the Qur’anic command to spread Islam as a way to peace. The resort to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurub (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of "opening" the world to Islam...
.......Unbelievers who stand in the way, creating obstacles for the da’wa, are blamed for this state of war, for the da’wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it. In other words, those who resist Islam cause wars.....
......It’s “oppression” when Muslim immigrants in the West must live by the same, secular laws as the native infidels, not sharia, and “injustice” in the end refers to pretty much all societies not subjugated to obedience to the will of Allah. “Injustice” can thus be used to describe all non-Islamic systems, for instance Western democracy.
......it is not seen as aggression or war when Muslims attack non-Muslims. On the contrary, it is seen as aggression when non-Muslims resist the Islamization of their lands and thus “place obstacles in the way” of the spread of Islam.
.....Since a refusal to submit to sharia is a rebellion against Allah, the very existence of non-Muslim communities can be viewed as an act of aggression.
http://wolfgangbruno.blogspot.com/2006/07/islamic-dictionary-for-infidels.html
"......In
public interviews Bakri condemned the
killing of all innocent civilians.
Later when he addressed his own followers he explained that
he had in fact been referring only to Muslims as only they were innocent:
“Yes I condemn killing any innocent people, but not any kuffar.” "
Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
Speaking publicly, and then privately, regarding the London 7/7 bombing victims.
"....when we say innocent people, we mean muslims....
....If you are a non-muslim, then you are guilty...."
Anjem Choudary
UK muslim community leader, talks of the London 7/7 bombing victims
Later when he addressed his own followers he explained that
he had in fact been referring only to Muslims as only they were innocent:
“Yes I condemn killing any innocent people, but not any kuffar.” "
Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
Speaking publicly, and then privately, regarding the London 7/7 bombing victims.
"....when we say innocent people, we mean muslims....
....If you are a non-muslim, then you are guilty...."
Anjem Choudary
UK muslim community leader, talks of the London 7/7 bombing victims
[link]
The treatment of muslim apostates
Devout muslims often *insist*, when speaking to ignorant 'unbelievers', here in the West, that,
- 'ISLAM is Peace' or,
- 'ISLAM is a peaceful religion' or,
- 'ISLAM is a very tolerant religion'.
AND YET....
Among themselves, devout muslims and their clerics [their 'holy' men] clearly endorse the killing of [within Sharia jurisdictions] those who abandon ISLAM.
In places where ISLAM [Sharia] / muslims, are TOTALLY free to regulate their society [e.g. Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt], EX-MUSLIMS are persecuted and killed,
....for being EX-MUSLIMS.
In Saudi Arabia, if a muslim reveals that he has converted to Christianity, he is executed, by beheading.
THIS IS TRUE!
In many muslim countries [e.g. Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, and in all Sharia jurisdictions] EX-muslims [and non-muslims], are often persecuted and killed.
....AND REMEMBER THESE ARE PLACES WHERE MUSLIMS ARE FREE TO REGULATE THEIR SOCIETY !!
Some may ask,
....It should, because of the Ummah
"Why
should so called muslim intolerance, in far-off countries be of concern
to us, living in the 'West'???"
....It should, because of the Ummah
The claim, that 'ISLAM is a very tolerant religion', is A LIE.
And it is a lie, WHICH EVERY MUSLIM CLERIC MUST BE AWARE OF.
Why?
Because muslim clerics, who study the Koran and Hadith, must be aware of their own 'religious' texts and 'doctrines'!
TRUTH....
ISLAM is only 'tolerant' where it is still politically weak, and where it has little political influence.
Isn't it a 'give away', that 'moderate ISLAM' only exists in Western nations?
FURTHER REFERENCES....
"All five major schools
of Islamic jurisprudence agree that a sane male apostate must be
executed.
....A faith which people maintain because of the fear of death cannot be genuine faith. This faith will be manifestly hypocritically chosen to deceive in order to save one's life."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam
....A faith which people maintain because of the fear of death cannot be genuine faith. This faith will be manifestly hypocritically chosen to deceive in order to save one's life."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam
The Hadith instructs muslims,
"...If somebody (a
Muslim) discards his religion, kill him." [comment...
ex-muslims are, just more
'non-muslims' to hate, and kill]
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.260
Quote from ISLAMIC law [Sharia], speaking on the obligations muslims fulfil [to remain a muslim]...
Ibn
'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam
and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has
been established. Whoever
leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and
his blood may legally be
spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there
is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of
Ramadan."....
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110
Note the words...
".....his blood may legally be spilled."
And...
"....those who reject
Allah have no protector."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
'Takfir' = accusing other 'muslims' of apostasy [and then are deemed to be people who's blood can be 'lawfully' spilled].
"....takfir or takfeer is the practice of
declaring unbeliever or kafir (pl. kuffār), an individual or a
group previously
considered Muslim."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfir
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takfir
January
7, 2008
Eight peace-seeking tribal elders shot dead by jihadists in Pakistan
....Eight tribal leaders attempting to broker a ceasefire in Pakistan's dangerous north-west province have been shot dead by suspected Islamic militants in eight separate killings.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019482.php
Eight peace-seeking tribal elders shot dead by jihadists in Pakistan
....Eight tribal leaders attempting to broker a ceasefire in Pakistan's dangerous north-west province have been shot dead by suspected Islamic militants in eight separate killings.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019482.php
May
14, 2008
Afghan teacher shot dead after speech condemning suicide bombings
Why Islamic reform is about as likely as an attack by men from Mars, part 65320: "Afghan teacher killed after speech condemning suicide bombings," from The Associated Press, May 14 (thanks to Jeffrey Imm):
.....KABUL, Afghanistan: A teacher was shot to death in northern Afghanistan after he gave a speech condemning suicide bombings, officials said Wednesday.
.....Hadi spoke at a gathering of about 700 people, including the Kunduz governor, and was on his way home when he was killed,
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021017.php
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/14/asia/AS-GEN-Afghan-Teacher-Killed.php
Afghan teacher shot dead after speech condemning suicide bombings
Why Islamic reform is about as likely as an attack by men from Mars, part 65320: "Afghan teacher killed after speech condemning suicide bombings," from The Associated Press, May 14 (thanks to Jeffrey Imm):
.....KABUL, Afghanistan: A teacher was shot to death in northern Afghanistan after he gave a speech condemning suicide bombings, officials said Wednesday.
.....Hadi spoke at a gathering of about 700 people, including the Kunduz governor, and was on his way home when he was killed,
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021017.php
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/14/asia/AS-GEN-Afghan-Teacher-Killed.php
October
1, 2007
Imam shot dead the day after he spoke out against Islamic jihadists
.....Wonder why more peaceful Muslims don't speak out against the jihad?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018328.php
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iufo5EIuTf16OBMhY7j5pfzWQ3vg
Imam shot dead the day after he spoke out against Islamic jihadists
.....Wonder why more peaceful Muslims don't speak out against the jihad?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018328.php
http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iufo5EIuTf16OBMhY7j5pfzWQ3vg
In reference to these last
news reports [above]...
"....those who reject
Allah have no protector."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
".....his blood may legally be spilled."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110
[link]
Real world EX-muslims, explain real world ISLAM
If you wish to know what real world ISLAM truly teaches, and how it truly acts in the world,
....and you want to be able to cut through the falsehood, lies, and deception of devout muslims,
....then seek out the accounts and experiences, of real world EX-muslims.
Jun 19, 2008
Muslim Mindset: 'The hatred is in Muhammad himself'
To Westerners and moderate Muslims shocked by the radical form of Islam now topping nightly newscasts, the efforts of liberal-minded Muslims like Tawfik Hamid, Italian Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi and a handful of others may seem like the perfect solution. Not so for Ali Sina, who has a different suggestion: destroy Islam.
.....Sina grew up a non-practicing Muslim. Raised in Iran, educated in Pakistan and Italy and now living in Canada, he began jousting with believers in the 1990s. What bothered him, he tells The Jerusalem Post, was not the penchant for jihad and intolerance that certain fanatical Muslims displayed, but the foundation for such ills in the Koran and core Islamic texts.
....Through the Faith Freedom Web site, Sina lists canonical references to Muhammad's actions and offers $50,000 to anyone who can disprove Sina's charge that Islam's prophet was "a narcissist, a misogynist, a rapist, a pedophile, a lecher, a torturer, a mass murderer, a cult leader, an assassin, a terrorist, a mad man and a looter.
.....With violent conquest and contempt for non-believers central to the tenets of the faith, Sina argues, attempts to forge a moderate form of Islam are doomed.
"The idea that Islam can be reformed is a fallacy," he scoffs.
....Sina has little patience for those who believe they can temper Islam with reason and mutual respect, or for those who remain cowed by the masses of Muslim devotees around the world.
"Islam is the biggest hoax, the biggest lie," he says. "Yes, a billion people believe it. But truth is truth. People will eventually see it. Believe me, there is no other answer. We will pay a great price until we realize that this is the solution - to undermine Islam itself, to show Muslims that this religion is not from God, that Muhammad was a charlatan and a liar."
....But I see that truth works. So many people who are now writing for me and putting things up on Youtube; seven or eight years ago, we were having fierce debates. Now, they are my greatest allies. There are many people who have seen the light after reading FFI and many of them are now working on my side, trying to help others to see the truth.
....I do not want to kill the enemy. I want to win them as friends and allies. That is the real victory. In this way, we win because we eliminate our enemy, and our enemy wins by eliminating his ignorance and hate. That is why I believe in my cause. That is why I think I am an instrument of peace.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1213794275742&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021475.php
Muslim Mindset: 'The hatred is in Muhammad himself'
To Westerners and moderate Muslims shocked by the radical form of Islam now topping nightly newscasts, the efforts of liberal-minded Muslims like Tawfik Hamid, Italian Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi and a handful of others may seem like the perfect solution. Not so for Ali Sina, who has a different suggestion: destroy Islam.
.....Sina grew up a non-practicing Muslim. Raised in Iran, educated in Pakistan and Italy and now living in Canada, he began jousting with believers in the 1990s. What bothered him, he tells The Jerusalem Post, was not the penchant for jihad and intolerance that certain fanatical Muslims displayed, but the foundation for such ills in the Koran and core Islamic texts.
....Through the Faith Freedom Web site, Sina lists canonical references to Muhammad's actions and offers $50,000 to anyone who can disprove Sina's charge that Islam's prophet was "a narcissist, a misogynist, a rapist, a pedophile, a lecher, a torturer, a mass murderer, a cult leader, an assassin, a terrorist, a mad man and a looter.
.....With violent conquest and contempt for non-believers central to the tenets of the faith, Sina argues, attempts to forge a moderate form of Islam are doomed.
"The idea that Islam can be reformed is a fallacy," he scoffs.
....Sina has little patience for those who believe they can temper Islam with reason and mutual respect, or for those who remain cowed by the masses of Muslim devotees around the world.
"Islam is the biggest hoax, the biggest lie," he says. "Yes, a billion people believe it. But truth is truth. People will eventually see it. Believe me, there is no other answer. We will pay a great price until we realize that this is the solution - to undermine Islam itself, to show Muslims that this religion is not from God, that Muhammad was a charlatan and a liar."
....But I see that truth works. So many people who are now writing for me and putting things up on Youtube; seven or eight years ago, we were having fierce debates. Now, they are my greatest allies. There are many people who have seen the light after reading FFI and many of them are now working on my side, trying to help others to see the truth.
....I do not want to kill the enemy. I want to win them as friends and allies. That is the real victory. In this way, we win because we eliminate our enemy, and our enemy wins by eliminating his ignorance and hate. That is why I believe in my cause. That is why I think I am an instrument of peace.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1213794275742&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021475.php
Seek out the accounts and experiences, of real world EX-muslims, who know ISLAM far better than non-muslims ever can...
http://www.islam-watch.org/IW/aboutus.htm
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/
http://www.apostatesofislam.com/
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/
http://www.apostatesofislam.com/
[link]
The 'Ummah' - the worldwide muslim community of believers
Some may ask,
"Why should so called muslim intolerance,
in far-off countries be of concern to us, living in the 'West'???"
Q.
How is, what happens in far off, muslim countries [e.g. Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt], relevant to us, ....in countries like Australia??
A.
Devout muslims in countries like Australia, CONSIDER THEMSELVES to be a part of the worldwide muslim community of believers, the UMMAH.
All devout muslims regard themselves as muslims 1st, and as being citizens of Australia, England, France, Holland, etc, - a distant 2nd.
Devout muslims are [and regard themselves as] a part of the worldwide muslim community, the UMMAH.
To be a muslim, every muslim has a 'religious' obligation to work, and must demonstrate his willingness to work, to impose Sharia law [Allah's 'just' law], upon all people, INCLUDING upon the non-muslims [where muslims reside].
This aim is called JIHAD, or "The Cause of Allah", or "Allah's Cause", or "The Way of Allah".
ISLAM's intention, and consequently the intention of every devout muslim, is to slowly, gain political influence within non-muslim nations, and to eventually impose Sharia law, upon those non-muslim nations - - and this aim [to impose Sharia law upon non-muslims] is an obligation upon all muslims.
It follows, that if muslims around the world are a community of 'believers', with common worldwide aims [a claim which is being made by muslims themselves!], then concerns expressed here, about what devout muslims are doing in countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, etc, is a valid one.
REFERENCES....
News item...
Local push for Islamic state
Barney Zwartz
January 9, 2007
......in a seminar in Australia this month.
.....Dr Durie said......the purpose of the conference was to "inspire and mobilise Muslims to establish Islamic government....of sharia law with no concession to other principles....".
Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Wassim Doureihi said the purpose was to highlight the reality of political struggle.....and the obligations of Muslims in Australia....
..."Islam is universal..."
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/local-push-for-islamic-state/2007/01/08/1168104922239.html
Barney Zwartz
January 9, 2007
......in a seminar in Australia this month.
.....Dr Durie said......the purpose of the conference was to "inspire and mobilise Muslims to establish Islamic government....of sharia law with no concession to other principles....".
Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman Wassim Doureihi said the purpose was to highlight the reality of political struggle.....and the obligations of Muslims in Australia....
..."Islam is universal..."
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/local-push-for-islamic-state/2007/01/08/1168104922239.html
"........In
the context of Islam, the word ummah is used to mean the diaspora or
"Community of the Believers" (ummat al-mu'minin), and thus the whole
Muslim world."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah
For further information,
Google.....
ummah "way of allah"
Regards the muslim obligation, to strive for 'Allah's Cause', the Hadith says....
Allah's
Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To
believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked,
"What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad
(religious fighting) in Allah's Cause."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025
Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.045
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025
Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.045
[link]
Sharia law
Sharia law is a system of ISLAMIC law which aims to govern ALL ASPECTS of a persons life.
In all Sharia law jurisdictions, muslims, and non-muslims, are treated separately [unequally], and have differing 'rights', under Sharia law!
This is because, in all Sharia jurisdictions, muslims are 'favoured people', while 'unbelievers' are regarded as 'guilty' [people].
....being 'guilty' for their 'unbelief', and rejection of ISLAM.
That is a political APARTHEID.
....or using the Lexicon of devout muslims, THAT IS 'RACIST'!
In all Sharia jurisdictions today [e.g. In places like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt], non-muslims who openly live an un-ISLAMIC lifestyle [including openly displaying their, different, faith] are persecuted, and often killed, for 'insulting' ISLAM.
Turkey is often given, as an example of a stable, secular democracy, and as an ISLAMIC country.
Yet even in a country like Turkey, which is promoted to be a 'secular', 'moderate', muslim state, non-muslims are commonly persecuted, and killed, for 'insulting' ISLAM.
In Sharia jurisdictions, in recent years, 'unbelievers' have been *killed* by [sometimes self appointed] 'morality police' for infringements like;
- mixed sexes having a picnic in a public place,
- playing 'Western' music in a public place,
- drinking alcohol,
- openly displaying un-ISLAMIC
religious symbols, and
- for 'insulting ISLAM' in other ways.
In Sharia jurisdictions, people of other faiths are 'permitted' to follow their faith,
.....BUT, ONLY WITHIN A TIGHT STRICTURE, WHICH IS REGULATED BY MUSLIMS.
.....AND, IN A FORM WHICH MUST NOT, AND CANNOT OFFER 'OFFENCE', TO ISLAM, AND LOCAL MUSLIMS.
While muslims can live according to the determinations and requirements of their faith with full sanction.
REFERENCES....
April
14, 2007
“The right to legislate belongs to God alone, and whoever disputes that is an apostate.
The members of parliament deserve only death” [source, 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' ]
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016055.php
“The right to legislate belongs to God alone, and whoever disputes that is an apostate.
The members of parliament deserve only death” [source, 'Al Qaeda in Iraq' ]
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016055.php
15
April 2007
Group cleared over Iran murders
By Frances Harrison
Group cleared over Iran murders
By Frances Harrison
[The
accused men believed they were allowed to kill immoral people
- photo caption]
Iran's
Supreme Court has acquitted a group of men charged over a series of
gruesome killings in 2002, according to lawyers for the victims'
families.
The vigilantes were not guilty because their victims were involved in un-Islamic activities, the court found.
The killers said they believed Islam let them spill the blood of anyone engaged in illicit activities if they issued two warnings to the victims.
The serial killings took place in 2002 in the south-eastern city of Kerman.
....The accused, who were all members of an Islamic paramilitary force, told the court their understanding of the teachings of one Islamic cleric allowed them to kill immoral people if they had ignored two warnings to stop their bad behaviour.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6557679.stm
The vigilantes were not guilty because their victims were involved in un-Islamic activities, the court found.
The killers said they believed Islam let them spill the blood of anyone engaged in illicit activities if they issued two warnings to the victims.
The serial killings took place in 2002 in the south-eastern city of Kerman.
....The accused, who were all members of an Islamic paramilitary force, told the court their understanding of the teachings of one Islamic cleric allowed them to kill immoral people if they had ignored two warnings to stop their bad behaviour.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6557679.stm
March
23, 2005
Death at 'immoral' picnic in the park
Students are beaten to death for playing music as Shia militiamen run amok
.....In Basra.....Islamic militias already are beginning to apply their own version of that law [Sharia], without authority from above or any challenge from the police.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article434762.ece
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/005463.php
Death at 'immoral' picnic in the park
Students are beaten to death for playing music as Shia militiamen run amok
.....In Basra.....Islamic militias already are beginning to apply their own version of that law [Sharia], without authority from above or any challenge from the police.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article434762.ece
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/005463.php
21 Nov
2007
Iran: 50 young people condemned to death for 'immorality'
[Comment: Is this an image of the moral, and the immoral??? Can you sense the 'love' & 'tolerance ' in her eyes? Here 'she' is again, 'consoling' those about to die.]
Tehran, 21 Nov. (AKI) – Iranian police responsible for moral crimes have announced death sentences for 50 people in the latest clampdown on what the authorities term as "immoral behaviour".
.......While announcing that arrests would continue, the Iranian general said that 53 percent of those arrested were aged between 17 and 25 years.
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1580186303
"....condemned to death for 'immorality' "
Iran: 50 young people condemned to death for 'immorality'
[Comment: Is this an image of the moral, and the immoral??? Can you sense the 'love' & 'tolerance ' in her eyes? Here 'she' is again, 'consoling' those about to die.]
Tehran, 21 Nov. (AKI) – Iranian police responsible for moral crimes have announced death sentences for 50 people in the latest clampdown on what the authorities term as "immoral behaviour".
.......While announcing that arrests would continue, the Iranian general said that 53 percent of those arrested were aged between 17 and 25 years.
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1580186303
"....condemned to death for 'immorality' "
Further...
Sharia law entrenches a mindset in muslims, where the abuse of non-muslims is the norm, and is not morally questioned.
.....as 'unbelievers', they are the 'guilty' people, and therefore they have no rights.
"....those who reject
Allah have no protector."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
Being an 'unbeliever' [who 'causes' trouble] within a Sharia law jurisdiction, could be compared to, in consequence, to being declared an 'Outlaw', in Old English Law.
In all Sharia jurisdictions,
".....When Muslims say Islam accepts
Christianity and Judaism,
they mean only the versions that were invented by Muhammad.
All the Christians and the Jews who do not submit to Islam
and want to interpret their religion in their own way
are disbelievers and should be killed....."
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51021p2.htm
they mean only the versions that were invented by Muhammad.
All the Christians and the Jews who do not submit to Islam
and want to interpret their religion in their own way
are disbelievers and should be killed....."
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51021p2.htm
The growing influence of Sharia in MALAYSIA today....
Church demolished in Muslim-run state
June 19 2007
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=126&art_id=nw20070619141302153C420344
June 19 2007
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=126&art_id=nw20070619141302153C420344
16 May 2006
Malaysia is considering its multi-cultural credentials after a crowd of Muslims on Sunday broke up a meeting called to defend the rights of religious minorities.
......."I'm becoming an alien in Malaysia, in my own country," says Dr Jacob George.
......"There's a creeping Islamicisation in our society and this isn't appropriate because we're a multi-religious, multi-racial country."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4965580.stm
Malaysia is considering its multi-cultural credentials after a crowd of Muslims on Sunday broke up a meeting called to defend the rights of religious minorities.
......."I'm becoming an alien in Malaysia, in my own country," says Dr Jacob George.
......"There's a creeping Islamicisation in our society and this isn't appropriate because we're a multi-religious, multi-racial country."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4965580.stm
Destruction of Non-Muslim Worship Centers
Riles Faith Minorities in Malaysia
By Sean Yoong for AP:
April 01, 2007
http://christianpost.com/article/20070330/26613_Destruction_of_Non-Muslim_Worship_Centers_Riles_Faith_Minorities_in_Malaysia.htm
By Sean Yoong for AP:
April 01, 2007
http://christianpost.com/article/20070330/26613_Destruction_of_Non-Muslim_Worship_Centers_Riles_Faith_Minorities_in_Malaysia.htm
In all Sharia law jurisdictions, muslims, and non-muslims, are treated separately [unequally], and have differing 'rights', under Sharia law!
In
Islamic states, other religions are segregated and cannot attain the
same rights that the
state grants to the Islamic religion......
In Islamic States, people who speak out against the state are separated and segregated
from the rest of society and imprisoned.
All of the above is APARTHEID! If you do not agree then you are denying the oppression of
millions of these people.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1972248/posts
state grants to the Islamic religion......
In Islamic States, people who speak out against the state are separated and segregated
from the rest of society and imprisoned.
All of the above is APARTHEID! If you do not agree then you are denying the oppression of
millions of these people.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1972248/posts
Religious freedom in Pakistan
Electoral process for non-Muslims
In 1980s Zia ul-Haq introduced a system under which non-Muslims could vote for only candidates of their own religion. Seats were reserved for minorities in the national and provincial assemblies. Government officials stated that the separate electorates system is a form of affirmative action designed to ensure minority representation, and that efforts are underway to achieve a consensus among religious minorities on this issue. But critics argue that under this system Muslim candidates no longer had any incentive to pay attention to the minorities. Pakistan's separate electoral system for different religions has been described as 'political Apartheid'.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_religious_freedom_in_Pakistan#Electoral_process_for_non-Muslims
Electoral process for non-Muslims
In 1980s Zia ul-Haq introduced a system under which non-Muslims could vote for only candidates of their own religion. Seats were reserved for minorities in the national and provincial assemblies. Government officials stated that the separate electorates system is a form of affirmative action designed to ensure minority representation, and that efforts are underway to achieve a consensus among religious minorities on this issue. But critics argue that under this system Muslim candidates no longer had any incentive to pay attention to the minorities. Pakistan's separate electoral system for different religions has been described as 'political Apartheid'.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_religious_freedom_in_Pakistan#Electoral_process_for_non-Muslims
This next story, relates directly to the facts of the last story....
2 March 2007
Hindus feel the heat in Pakistan
.......Political apartheid
In Pakistan's political system, the minorities, such as Hindus, Christians and Sikhs, remain outcasts despite represented in every major political party.
After Gen Pervez Musharraf seized power in 1999, he scrapped the controversial separate electorate system introduced former dictator Gen Zia-ul-Haq in 1980s.
Under the separate electorate system, non-Muslims could only vote for candidates of their own religion. Seats were reserved for minorities in the national and provincial assemblies.
Critics said Muslim candidates no longer had any incentive to pay attention to the aspirations of the minorities.
.....Sudham Chand, a Hindu community leader who led a local campaign to scrap the separate electorate system was killed in broad daylight. His murder conveyed many a message.
The killers were not arrested. His brother later migrated to India.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6367773.stm
One opinion at a blog....
Most of the
Muslims here state that they are moderates...
Yet almost every one supports:
--- The execution of apostates
--- Punishment of blasphemers and those who voice disagreement
--- That jihad as a war to spread Islam is God’s law so it cannot be removed from Shari’ah.
--- That freedom of speech does not include harming others (This means that it does not include speaking out against islam)
--- That restrictions against Jews and Christians in Muslim countries is right.
--- that all other countries MUST give Muslims full religious rights or else.
They say that these are God’s laws so they cannot be changed. But that we don’t need to worry about them and should ignore them.
None of these sound like moderate positions to me.
All I really care about is the question you ask….
---- do they respect the road others are taking?
---- will they agree not to kill apostates or punish them in any way?
---- will they end their system of religious/social/political apartheid?
---- will they not harass or kill those who disagree with them?
---- will they leave the political/social/religious structure of western countries alone so that we can live as we choose?
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/denmark/TUJM6T2GL9G31PGNP/p2
Yet almost every one supports:
--- The execution of apostates
--- Punishment of blasphemers and those who voice disagreement
--- That jihad as a war to spread Islam is God’s law so it cannot be removed from Shari’ah.
--- That freedom of speech does not include harming others (This means that it does not include speaking out against islam)
--- That restrictions against Jews and Christians in Muslim countries is right.
--- that all other countries MUST give Muslims full religious rights or else.
They say that these are God’s laws so they cannot be changed. But that we don’t need to worry about them and should ignore them.
None of these sound like moderate positions to me.
All I really care about is the question you ask….
---- do they respect the road others are taking?
---- will they agree not to kill apostates or punish them in any way?
---- will they end their system of religious/social/political apartheid?
---- will they not harass or kill those who disagree with them?
---- will they leave the political/social/religious structure of western countries alone so that we can live as we choose?
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/denmark/TUJM6T2GL9G31PGNP/p2
Sharia law may result in 'legal
apartheid'
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones
17/02/2008
Senior religious leaders attack multiculturalism and sharia law today, warning that they are "disastrous", socially divisive and are destroying Britain's culture and values.
Lord Carey and Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor rebut the call of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, for Islamic law to be recognised in Britain.
....He suggests that such a move could embolden some Muslims to try to turn Britain into a country ruled by Islamic law which, he says, contradicts principles of human rights and allows the persecution of Christians.
....Dr Williams argued that Muslims should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty". However, Lord Carey says the potential damage of Dr Williams's idea of incorporating sharia courts into civil law "does not bear thinking about". He says that it would be dangerous and would encourage some Muslims to try to turn Britain into an Islamic state.
....According to Lord Carey, sharia law disadvantages women and minorities, contradicts principles of human rights and has led to the persecution of Christians in countries such as Nigeria, where churches have been burned down.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1578211/Sharia-law-may-result-in-'legal-apartheid'.html
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones
17/02/2008
Senior religious leaders attack multiculturalism and sharia law today, warning that they are "disastrous", socially divisive and are destroying Britain's culture and values.
Lord Carey and Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor rebut the call of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, for Islamic law to be recognised in Britain.
....He suggests that such a move could embolden some Muslims to try to turn Britain into a country ruled by Islamic law which, he says, contradicts principles of human rights and allows the persecution of Christians.
....Dr Williams argued that Muslims should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty". However, Lord Carey says the potential damage of Dr Williams's idea of incorporating sharia courts into civil law "does not bear thinking about". He says that it would be dangerous and would encourage some Muslims to try to turn Britain into an Islamic state.
....According to Lord Carey, sharia law disadvantages women and minorities, contradicts principles of human rights and has led to the persecution of Christians in countries such as Nigeria, where churches have been burned down.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1578211/Sharia-law-may-result-in-'legal-apartheid'.html
From ISLAMIC law [Sharia], the sanction of the murder of 'unbelievers'...
Ibn
'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam
and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has
been established. Whoever
leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and
his blood may legally be
spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there
is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of
Ramadan."....
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/fiqhussunnah/fus3_50.html#3.110
What this muslim text [above] is saying is, that all muslims are 'sanctified', in killing 'unbelievers'.
Because within a Sharia jurisdiction, 'unbelievers' are 'guilty' people, not deserving of mercy.
And in a similar theme, this quote from the Koran [follow the link for the full quote].....
....those who reject (Allah),- for them is
destruction, and (Allah) will render their deeds astray (from their
mark).
....those who reject Allah have no protector.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
....those who reject Allah have no protector.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
Bukhari Hadith Volume 9, Book 83,
Number 50:
......"The legal regulations of Diya (Blood-money) and the (ransom for) releasing of the captives,
and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever)."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/083.sbt.html#009.083.050
......"The legal regulations of Diya (Blood-money) and the (ransom for) releasing of the captives,
and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever)."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/083.sbt.html#009.083.050
Bukhari Hadith Volume 4, Book 52,
Number 283:
"What is written in this paper?"......
".......the judgment that no Muslim should be killed for killing an infidel."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.283
"What is written in this paper?"......
".......the judgment that no Muslim should be killed for killing an infidel."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.283
"We don't make a distinction between
civilians and non-civilians,
innocents and non-innocents.
Only between Muslims and unbelievers.
And the life of an unbeliever has no value.
It has no sanctity."
Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
quote cited from here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Bakri_Mohammed#Quotes
and here...
Attack on London 'inevitable'
April 19, 2004
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/19/1082326119414.html?from=storyrhs&oneclick=true
innocents and non-innocents.
Only between Muslims and unbelievers.
And the life of an unbeliever has no value.
It has no sanctity."
Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
quote cited from here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Bakri_Mohammed#Quotes
and here...
Attack on London 'inevitable'
April 19, 2004
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/19/1082326119414.html?from=storyrhs&oneclick=true
More consequences of Sharia jurisdictions, for 'unbelievers'....
The
Dhimmi: An Overview
".......No legal rights. Jews may not testify in [a Sharia] court against a Muslim and have no legal right to dispute or challenge anything done to them by Muslims.
There is no such thing as a Muslim raping a Jewish woman; there is no such thing as a Muslim murdering a Jew (at most, it can be manslaughter).
In contrast, a Jew who strikes a Muslim is killed."
http://www.dhimmi.com/dhimmi_overview.htm
http://www.dhimmi.com/victimsgallery.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Treatment_of_non-Muslims
http://answering-islam.org/NonMuslims/rights.htm
http://www.dhimmi.com/dhimmilinks.htm
".......No legal rights. Jews may not testify in [a Sharia] court against a Muslim and have no legal right to dispute or challenge anything done to them by Muslims.
There is no such thing as a Muslim raping a Jewish woman; there is no such thing as a Muslim murdering a Jew (at most, it can be manslaughter).
In contrast, a Jew who strikes a Muslim is killed."
http://www.dhimmi.com/dhimmi_overview.htm
http://www.dhimmi.com/victimsgallery.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Treatment_of_non-Muslims
http://answering-islam.org/NonMuslims/rights.htm
http://www.dhimmi.com/dhimmilinks.htm
"......A
Muslim man commits rape
if and only if he has sex with a Muslim
woman out of
wedlock.
Having forced sex with an infidel woman does not at all constitute rape, Islamically speaking."
"......The natural conclusion is that Muslim men are completely free to Islamically rape these infidel women,
if these whores fall in Muslim men's hands."
http://islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/MeatImam.htm
an 'ex-muslim' web site, critical of ISLAM
Having forced sex with an infidel woman does not at all constitute rape, Islamically speaking."
"......The natural conclusion is that Muslim men are completely free to Islamically rape these infidel women,
if these whores fall in Muslim men's hands."
http://islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/MeatImam.htm
an 'ex-muslim' web site, critical of ISLAM
Sharia
law entrenches a mindset in
muslims,
where the abuse of non-muslims is the norm,
and is not morally questioned.
.....as 'unbelievers', they are the 'guilty' people,
and therefore they have no rights, and 'no protector'.
where the abuse of non-muslims is the norm,
and is not morally questioned.
.....as 'unbelievers', they are the 'guilty' people,
and therefore they have no rights, and 'no protector'.
"....those who reject
Allah have no protector."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008
008 - 011
An example of culturally justified abuse of non-muslims...
In Sydney, Australia, young muslims target young non-muslim girls, for rape.
In a secular non-ISLAMIC court system, their defence effectively was that,
"I'm not
doing anything wrong.",
.....i was only having sex with non-muslim 'sluts',"The
brothers, Muslims from Pakistan, targeted mostly Anglo-Saxon
Australian girls whom they would later call "sluts" as they
attacked them."
Later, the rapist denies any 'guilt'...
"....attacks
on girls as young as
13.... they
had no right to say “no.” They
were not covering their face or
wearing a headscarf, and therefore, the rapist proclaimed: “I’m
not doing anything wrong.”"
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/readarticle.asp?ID=20535&p=1
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/readarticle.asp?ID=20535&p=1
[link]
In 'moderate', secular, Turkey, more examples of culturally justified abuse [murder!], of non-muslims...
After Jihad attacks kills 58 people...
....muslims claim the same defence [...in another secular court, as in Sydney, above],
....'They
are not doing anything wrong.
.....My clients were killing 'unbelievers', conducting the Jihad.
.....Surely you can see that this was merely a manifestation of muslims engaging in their religious freedom [to kill 'unbelievers'].'
.....My clients were killing 'unbelievers', conducting the Jihad.
.....Surely you can see that this was merely a manifestation of muslims engaging in their religious freedom [to kill 'unbelievers'].'
/sarc
off ....this account is essentially true, read the
story!!!!
20 Dec 2005
Jihad is 'Muslim obligation'
A lawyer defending al Qaida-linked suspects standing trial for the 2003 suicide bombings in Istanbul told a court that jihad, or holy war, was an obligation for Muslims and his clients should not be prosecuted.
Christian victims....
Slain
evangelists were tortured, says Turkish doctor
April 20, 2007
(REUTERS)
MALATYA, Turkey -- Three Protestants murdered at a Christian publishing house in Malatya, Turkey, were tortured for three hours before their assailants slit their throats, a press report said Friday, quoting one of the doctors involved in the grisly case.
Dr. Murat Ugras, a spokesman for the Turgut Ozal Medical center, told the daily Hurriyet of hospital surgeons' fruitless efforts to save Ugur Yuksel, one of the three victims of the massacre at the Zirve (summit) publishing house, which distributed Christian literature.
"He had scores of knife cuts on his thighs, his testicles, his rectum, and his back," Ugras said. "His fingers were sliced to the bone.
"It is obvious that these wounds had been inflicted to torture him," he said.
The two others who were killed, Necati Aydin, pastor of Malatya's tiny Protestant community, and German Tilmann Geske, a Malatya resident with his wife and three children since 2003, were also tortured, press reports said.
........Gunaydin, 19, had reportedly made several visits beforehand to the publishing house to gain the confidence of the people working there, newspapers said.
The daily Radikal said that the German was the first to die and the two Turks were slaughtered only when police arrived at the door after receiving a call from a member of the Protestant community who grew suspicious when he found the office door locked.
http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070420-064724-9427r
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25192_Turkish_Christians_Tortured_Before_Murder&only
April 20, 2007
(REUTERS)
MALATYA, Turkey -- Three Protestants murdered at a Christian publishing house in Malatya, Turkey, were tortured for three hours before their assailants slit their throats, a press report said Friday, quoting one of the doctors involved in the grisly case.
Dr. Murat Ugras, a spokesman for the Turgut Ozal Medical center, told the daily Hurriyet of hospital surgeons' fruitless efforts to save Ugur Yuksel, one of the three victims of the massacre at the Zirve (summit) publishing house, which distributed Christian literature.
"He had scores of knife cuts on his thighs, his testicles, his rectum, and his back," Ugras said. "His fingers were sliced to the bone.
"It is obvious that these wounds had been inflicted to torture him," he said.
The two others who were killed, Necati Aydin, pastor of Malatya's tiny Protestant community, and German Tilmann Geske, a Malatya resident with his wife and three children since 2003, were also tortured, press reports said.
........Gunaydin, 19, had reportedly made several visits beforehand to the publishing house to gain the confidence of the people working there, newspapers said.
The daily Radikal said that the German was the first to die and the two Turks were slaughtered only when police arrived at the door after receiving a call from a member of the Protestant community who grew suspicious when he found the office door locked.
http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070420-064724-9427r
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25192_Turkish_Christians_Tortured_Before_Murder&only
Journalist victims...
January
20, 2007
Mainstream media covering up jihad killing in Turkey
Jihad Watch reader Paul has informed me that in its coverage of the murder of journalist Hrant Dink in Turkey, the mainstream media is neglecting to mention that the killer cried, "I shot the non-Muslim," as we reported here yesterday.
That little detail appeared in a Reuters report, but now, Paul points out, it is gone.
......Now why would this be initially reported and then disappear without a trace (or a retraction)? If it were inaccurate, I would expect some kind of correction or retraction to appear. And I certainly know from personal experience that the mainstream media, both liberal and conservative, is extremely reluctant to discuss the possibility that there might be some aspect of Islam that incites to violence, or that Muslims are committing violence because of religious principles, not because of poverty or ethnicity or Abu Ghraib or Britney Spears or whatever. And then there are the powerful Muslim advocacy groups in Western countries, which portray any honest depiction of jihad violence as "Islamophobia."
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2007_01.php#014915
Mainstream media covering up jihad killing in Turkey
Jihad Watch reader Paul has informed me that in its coverage of the murder of journalist Hrant Dink in Turkey, the mainstream media is neglecting to mention that the killer cried, "I shot the non-Muslim," as we reported here yesterday.
That little detail appeared in a Reuters report, but now, Paul points out, it is gone.
......Now why would this be initially reported and then disappear without a trace (or a retraction)? If it were inaccurate, I would expect some kind of correction or retraction to appear. And I certainly know from personal experience that the mainstream media, both liberal and conservative, is extremely reluctant to discuss the possibility that there might be some aspect of Islam that incites to violence, or that Muslims are committing violence because of religious principles, not because of poverty or ethnicity or Abu Ghraib or Britney Spears or whatever. And then there are the powerful Muslim advocacy groups in Western countries, which portray any honest depiction of jihad violence as "Islamophobia."
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2007_01.php#014915
[link]
'Dawa' - the invitation to ISLAM
Muslims will claim [say] that they do not force others to adopt ISLAM, or to convert to ISLAM...
And this is true, no one is forced to convert to ISLAM.
AND YET....
This ISLAMIC 'no compulsion' edict, does not apply to the imposition of Sharia law - upon all.
There is [absolutely] no choice, all, muslims AND non-muslims, must submit to Allah, and Allah's law, Sharia.
All people must be in submission to ISLAM / Allah.
This muslim 'work', to bring all in subjection to Sharia, is called JIHAD, or "The Cause of Allah", or "Allah's Cause", or "The Way of Allah".
....and this 'work' is an obligation to every devout muslim.
To every devout muslim, Jihad is the 'righteous' violent 'struggle' against unbelievers, [Jihad is 'justified' against all those who have rejected ISLAM, and rejected the muslim 'invitation', the Dawa].
REFERENCES....
Noble
Quran 2:190 Footnote:
Jihad is holy fighting in Allahs Cause.......Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.
....on page 39 of the Noble Qur’an , translation by Muhammad Khan
Jihad is holy fighting in Allahs Cause.......Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.
....on page 39 of the Noble Qur’an , translation by Muhammad Khan
The Hadith itself says....
Allah's
Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To
believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked,
"What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad
(religious fighting) in Allah's Cause."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025
Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.045
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025
Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.045
see also....
What
Islam Isn't - a [highly recommended] short article by
Dr. Peter Hammond
"Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard [veil] for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called 'religious rights.' ....."
"Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard [veil] for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called 'religious rights.' ....."
[link]
'The House of War'
Devout muslims divide the world into two areas,
- Dar-al-ISLAM [The House or Peace] and,
- Dar-al-Harb [The House or War]
Dar-al-Harb, is defined as all areas being non-Sharia jurisdictions, communities.
There is no muslim 'Peace', ever, with Dar-al-Harb.
But when muslims are politically weak, there can be a state of 'Truce' [Hudna] with non-Sharia jurisdictions, communities.
When muslims are politically weak, muslims are instructed to wait, until circumstances favour them,
....AND, that it is the obligation of every muslim, to work towards that circumstance.
That 'work' is called JIHAD, or "The Cause of Allah", or "Allah's Cause", or "The Way of Allah".
TO ALL DEVOUT MUSLIMS...
All actions which help the spread of Sharia are good, and justified [e.g. murdering 'unbelievers', is a good action, if those unbelievers are resisting the spread of Sharia].
TO ALL DEVOUT MUSLIMS...
All actions which hinder the spread of Sharia are evil actions, and these actions are the cause of all conflict with muslims [who are merely 'defending' ISLAM].
REFERENCES....
Dar-al-ISLAM
- The
House or Peace [all Sharia jurisdictions]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_al-Islam
Dar-al-Harb - The House or War [all non-Sharia jurisdictions, communities]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_al-Islam#Dar_al-Harb
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_al-Islam
Dar-al-Harb - The House or War [all non-Sharia jurisdictions, communities]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dar_al-Islam#Dar_al-Harb
Hudna [truce while weak]...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudna
http://www.israelemb.org/articles/2003/June/2003062700.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42792
http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Hudna_With_Hamas.asp
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1164881822237&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/013246.php
http://www.israelemb.org/articles/2003/June/2003062700.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42792
http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Hudna_With_Hamas.asp
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1164881822237&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/013246.php
Thursday
13th September, 2007
Live in peace till strong enough to wage jihad, says UK Deoband scholar to Muslims
London, Sept.8 : A Deobandi scholar believes Muslims should preach peace till they are strong enough to undertake a jihad, or a holy war.
Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani was quoted by the BBC as saying that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain, where they have the freedom to practise Islam, only until they gain enough power to engage in battle.
A former Sharia judge in Pakistan's Supreme Court, 64-year-old Usmani, is now an adviser to several global financial institutions and a regular visitor to Britain.
Polite and softly spoken, he revealed a detailed knowledge of world events and his words, for the most part, were balanced and considered.
He agreed that it was wrong to suggest that the entire non-Muslim world was intent on destroying Islam, but justifies an aggressive military jihad as a means of establishing global Islamic supremacy.
He believes Islamic modernists have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology.
"The question is whether aggressive battle is by itself commendable or not. If it is, why should the Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did Islam not stop it in the past?"
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=280465
Note in the article above.... "He believes Islamic modernists have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology."
Live in peace till strong enough to wage jihad, says UK Deoband scholar to Muslims
London, Sept.8 : A Deobandi scholar believes Muslims should preach peace till they are strong enough to undertake a jihad, or a holy war.
Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani was quoted by the BBC as saying that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain, where they have the freedom to practise Islam, only until they gain enough power to engage in battle.
A former Sharia judge in Pakistan's Supreme Court, 64-year-old Usmani, is now an adviser to several global financial institutions and a regular visitor to Britain.
Polite and softly spoken, he revealed a detailed knowledge of world events and his words, for the most part, were balanced and considered.
He agreed that it was wrong to suggest that the entire non-Muslim world was intent on destroying Islam, but justifies an aggressive military jihad as a means of establishing global Islamic supremacy.
He believes Islamic modernists have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology.
"The question is whether aggressive battle is by itself commendable or not. If it is, why should the Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did Islam not stop it in the past?"
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=280465
Note in the article above.... "He believes Islamic modernists have been bewitched by Western culture and ideology."
the same story as above, a different source...
September
8, 2007
Our followers ‘must live in peace until strong enough to wage jihad’
One of the world’s most respected Deobandi scholars believes that aggressive military jihad should be waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam” worldwide.
.....His views explode the myth that the creed of offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of traditional Islamic thinking.
....These words are not the product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars in the Deobandi tradition.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece
Our followers ‘must live in peace until strong enough to wage jihad’
One of the world’s most respected Deobandi scholars believes that aggressive military jihad should be waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam” worldwide.
.....His views explode the myth that the creed of offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of traditional Islamic thinking.
....These words are not the product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars in the Deobandi tradition.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece
See also, a comment on a Jihad Watch post....
The Patience of a Slow
Jihadist, Fathullah Gulen
The essence of Fathullah Gulen's message is patience and cunning....
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019405.php#c490932
The essence of Fathullah Gulen's message is patience and cunning....
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019405.php#c490932
[link]
A few accounts of the present [2008] worldwide moves, to outlaw all criticism, and scrutiny of ISLAM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021461.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021460.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/020580.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/020282.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021474.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021460.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/020580.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/020282.php
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021474.php
Clearly, TRUTH and freedom of speech, cannot be tolerated by ISLAM.
Did you know that,
TO ALL DEVOUT MUSLIMS...
....a
'Kuffar' [the
muslim derogatory term, for an 'unbeliever'],ISLAM......
a false religion, for a false people.
a false religion, for a false people.