2007-Apr-02
ISLAM
Succinctly...
".......And that is the crux
of it. "Islam is not a religion as
we in the
United States usually define it, because Islam does not consider
religion to be a private matter."
Instead, Islam
claims
the power of law – a very public matter. Furthermore, its laws grant
legal and economic rights according to each person’s religion, and it
gives
Muslims political power over non-Muslims. It also gives Muslims
a
moral imperative to conquer all of the world’s non-Muslims and
establish Islamic governance over them. Thus Islam can be better
understood as a political ideology than as a religion.
Islam feels
respected only when all other powers, be they religious or political,
submit to it. Islam also declares that its adherents can justly exert
lethal force when they believe Islam has been insulted by a lack of
proper respect for its superiority.
Nowadays,
when I hear someone say that Islam is a religion of peace, it reminds
me of a line from Tim Burton’s disturbing comedy, Mars Attacks:"
I recommend the series of articles by Dave
Bailey, where he logically,
and clearly,
explores the meaning of what ISLAM is...
[link]
It is Jihad folks,
until the end.
Thursday
13th September, 2007
Live in peace till strong
enough to wage jihad, says UK Deoband scholar to Muslims
London, Sept.8 : A Deobandi scholar
believes Muslims
should preach peace till they are strong enough to undertake a jihad,
or a holy war.
Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani was
quoted by the BBC as saying that Muslims should live peacefully in
countries such as Britain, where
they have the freedom to practise Islam, only until they gain
enough power to engage in battle.
A former Sharia judge in Pakistan's
Supreme Court, 64-year-old Usmani, is now an adviser to several global
financial institutions and a regular
visitor to Britain.
Polite and
softly spoken, he revealed a detailed knowledge of world events
and his words, for the most part, were balanced and considered.
He agreed that it was wrong to
suggest that the entire non-Muslim world was intent on destroying
Islam, but justifies an aggressive military jihad as a means of
establishing global Islamic supremacy.
He believes Islamic modernists have
been bewitched by Western culture and ideology.
"The question is whether aggressive
battle is by itself commendable or not. If it is, why should the
Muslims stop simply because territorial expansion in these days is
regarded as bad? And if it is not commendable, but deplorable, why did
Islam not stop it in the past?"
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=280465
Note in the article above....
"He
believes Islamic modernists have been bewitched by Western culture and
ideology."
This refers to
muslim apostates
living...
Jahiliyyah
1,
Jahiliyya
2
the same story as above, a different source...
September 8, 2007
Our followers ‘must live in
peace until strong enough to wage jihad’
One of the world’s most
respected Deobandi scholars believes that aggressive military
jihad should be waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam”
worldwide.
.....His views explode the myth that the
creed of offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of
traditional Islamic thinking.
....These words are not the
product of a radical extremist. They come from the pen of one of the most acclaimed scholars
in the Deobandi tradition.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece
selected online comment, on the timesonline
article page....
Once and for all, why don't people see Islam for what it is and always
has been, read the Koran, its all there, its simple, be passive if
the Kuffer is strong, then as your
power base grows, take over and destroy the non belivers, all
the people in this country that don't live near places like Blackburn
like i do haven't a clue what is going on, and yes, after working here
for the last 26 years i too am moving out of the area for this reason.
Why? because everybody else i know already has left.
Look at history, this all thing as just one outcome...
SF, Clitheroe, lancs
This man's remarks have resonance and support from Moslems because he
is saying what the Koran and the ahadith say: the Koran tells
Moslems that, when they are
few in number among the 'kuffr' (infidels) they must be quiet and not
attract attention, but grow in numbers
and strength and be prepared to eventually wage war, either with
violence or by supporting warriors with monetary funds, supporting the
fighters' families and by
'taqiyya' and da'wa (lies, obfuscations and, sometimes,
silences, towards the kuffr in order to deflect attention from the
moslem community's aims) and that moslems should also sow dissension
amongst the kuffr and appear to
befriend them (a form of dawa through 'inter-faith dialogues
which are really designed to
seek the kuffr's accommodation and acquiescence to moslem demands in
the kuffr's society). Is this all sounding familiar?
Babbling Brook, london,
There is further comment on this timesonline news report here,
See also, a comment on a
Jihad Watch post....
and...
Islam - House Of War
i.e.
'We muslims are not strong
enough to subdue or kill you [yet], so let us have 'peace' [until we
muslims are strong enough to resume our warfare against you]!'
and...
See!
There is no need for conflict.
Peaceful
muslims just want us to surrender peacefully,
to submit ourselves to an ISLAMIC, Sharia, jurisdiction [ 1, 2
].
sarc off/
Yep, the pronouncements of this Pakistani cleric,
Qari Hifzur Rehamn, sound pretty
consistent with [all devout muslim doctrine, toward the
Kuffar, and muslim
Jihad],
and is confirmed by the
Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia,
Sheikh Abdel Aziz al-Sheikh...
"...Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric
also explained that war was never Islam's ancient founder, the prophet
Mohammed's, first
choice: "He
gave three options: either
accept Islam, or surrender and pay tax, and they will be allowed to
remain in their land, observing their religion under the protection of
Muslims." Thus, according to the Grand Mufti, the
third option of violence
against non-Muslims was only a last
resort, if they refused to convert
or surrender peacefully to the
armies of Islam."
Creed of the sword
February
11, 2008
Turkish PM to Muslims in
Germany: "Assimilation is a
crime against humanity"
.....Cologne, Germany -- A crowd
of 16,000 expatriate Turks cheered Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
at a vast indoor auditorium in Germany on Sunday as he told them to
resist assimilation into the West.
...."Assimilation is a crime
against humanity," he told the crowd. Many Turks had travelled from
France, Belgium and the Netherlands to hear his hour-long address in
the shiny venue, the Koelnarena.
"I can well understand that you
are against assimilation," he said. "It is important to learn German,
but your Turkish language should not be neglected."
He said ethnic Turks abroad
should be more confident in standing up for their
interests, and should win election as mayors and members of
European national parliaments....
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019903.php
In effect endorsing ISLAMIC 'principles' [of, 'They must always accept us, we must never
accept them.']....
"WE BRING OUR LAWS, WE BRING OUR CULTURE,
AND WE DON'T WANT TO ASSIMILATE WITH YOU.
.....AND, WE WANT
OUR CULTURE, TO BE ACCEPTED EVERYWHERE."
A UK ex-muslim, who converted to Christianity declares,
describes,
muslims thus....
“They
[muslims] are such hypocrites — they want us to be
tolerant of everything they
want,
but they are intolerant of everything about
us.”
[link]
Do devout muslims have respect for their Christian neighbours [as
muslims are want to unceasingly assert] ?
Muslims say
that they do.
Always
[ .....muslims will say
this].
You will often hear
muslims making claims, such as these....
I claim that devout muslims show no
respect for their Christian neighbours [in spite of all
their insistent
words].
I claim that devout muslim
[words of] 'respect' for Christians is a total sham.
Good
advice to all, when you notice words coming out of the mouth of any devout muslim...
"...the
more I read the words of any speech given by a Muslim...I find myself
doing more and more micro managing and spending more and more time
looking for the DAWA or TAQQIYYA.....as you study the tactics of the
Islamists you begin to easily be able to decipher the "Islamo cryptics"
whenever a Muslim speaks...."
'exsgtbrown'
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019659.php#c500044
i.e. When a devout muslim speaks to a non-muslim audience, look for
'weasel words',
....
words that
are intended to
deceive, while portraying sincerity. [
example1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_words
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawah
- the 'invitation' to come to ISLAM, or,
promoting ISLAM to non-muslims.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
- the ISLAMIC doctrine [obligation!] of 'sanctified' lying to
non-muslims, to 'protect oneself'.
Read; lying to promote ISLAM, and to undermine the culture of the naive
Kuffar.
It is 'easy' for muslims to claim that ISLAM/muslims are
tolerant of NON-muslims, when muslims are
living as a minority among NON-muslims.
The real
test of muslim sincerity,
is to look at how muslims treat NON-muslims, when
NON-muslims live as a minority in Sharia jurisdictions.
Evidence....
No-respect1,
no-respect2,
no-respect3,
no-respect4,
no-respect5,
no-respect6,
no-respect7,
no-respect8,
no-respect9,
no-respect10,
no-respect11,
no-respect12,
no-respect13,
and many, many, more.
"The best index to a person's character is
(a) how he treats people who can't do him any good,
and (b) how
he treats people who can't fight back."
Abigail Van Buren
American Nick Berg [with no
idea of what is coming next],
with his
arms bound,
moments before his beheading by Allah's 'finest'.
Another act of 'muslim charity',
to 'honour' Allah.
Note the
Burkas,
worn by the 'heroes' of ISLAM.
"Nearly all men can stand adversity,
but if you want to test a man's character,
give him
power."
Abraham Lincoln
"A nation's greatness
is measured
by how it treats its weakest members."
Mahatma Ghandi
[link]
The 'guilty' people, ....[
meaning all
'unbelievers', according to ISLAM ].
The evidence is,
that when speaking candidly
among themselves,
muslims speak of Christians disparagingly,
disrespectfully...
- In one example, a UK
muslim
cleric describes
Christians as "...worse
than the muck", on muslim shoes.
- In another example, an
Australian born
muslim
cleric describes Christians
and all non-muslims as Kuffar,
as
'filth', "Kaffir
is the worst word ever written, a sign of infidelity, disbelief, filth,
a sign of dirt."
....When his assertions were later, widely publicised, the muslim
cleric then claimed his remarks were 'misunderstood'.
The TRUTH is that to every
devout muslim, Christians [and all
unbelievers] are a 'guilty'1,
'guilty'2,
people.
The
'guilty' - unbelievers.
....A people "guilty of not believing in God [Allah]."
Anjem Choudary talks of
the London,
7/7 victims.
Within Sharia jurisdictions, the blood of 'guilty' people [all
unbelievers, and all
'un-ISLAMIC' persons], can
be legally shed.
[ Hence, to
devout muslims, 9/11, Madrid, 7/7,
are all OK. cited1,
cited2
,
i.e. Any unbeliever can be
'killed', without legal fault being attributed to any muslim.
A muslim cleric opinion is
cited.
And the death of the 'immoral' are 'sanctified',
prescribed, examples cited1,
cited2,
cited3
]
According to ISLAM, Christians are
unbelievers, and are a 'guilty' people.
According to ISLAM, unbelievers are 'corrupted'
people,
and are a corrupting influence,
....they are 'filth'. [cited]
This [above] is what devout
muslims actually say about non-muslims.
What
i assert here, are not 'made up'
lies.
This is not 'hate speech'.
These assertions i make are verifiable
- verifiable from muslim sources [Koran & Hadith], from news
reports, from
muslim historical texts, from muslim cleric
doctrinal determinations.
I claim that all devout muslims,
view Christians [and all
'unbelievers'] who resist ISLAM's influence, as
the enemies
of
muslims.
I claim that all devout muslims
consider
themselves to be 'superior' [Koranic confirmation],
and consider themselves to be at war
with the 'guilty' unbelievers, in a war
against the politics, and the culture, of the 'guilty'
unbelievers.
I claim that all devout muslims
believe that in this war [with the enemies of Allah], the muslim
course-of-action should be to
deceive non-muslims,
and to tell non-muslims,
But, muslims will only be our 'friends', up until the time that muslim
communities
become strong enough to assert
themselves [and then, they will reveal their true agenda].
And they will then try to overwhelm their 'guilty'
enemies, and destroy their 'guilty'
communities, and their 'guilty'
culture.
This is already happening [2007, Dec] in some areas of
Europe, ....examples, Belgium,
Holland,
France,
Sweden.
[it is only the start of many more 'troubles']
If we allow muslims to prevail, they will then replace non-muslim,
'guilty' societies, with Sharia jurisdictions.
And we will all 'enjoy' the 'Peace
of ISLAM'.
[link]
And I claim that all devout muslims
view Christians [especially Christian women]
and Christian property merely as potential
war booty,
to be 'taken' at will.
And as far as war booty for devout muslims
is 'concerned', it seems to be a case of, 'First
in, best dressed.'
All this 'war booty' supposes a Koran & Hadith based
doctrine, to reward
the Jihadists for their 'good
works'...
The enemies of muslims, are
unbelievers, Jews, Christians...
And Allah has an 'immense reward' for muslims
who undertake Jihad,
.....oh yes, War booty,
Muhammad
is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the
disbelievers and merciful among themselves. Thou (O Muhammad) seest
them bowing and falling prostrate (in worship), seeking bounty from Allah and
(His) acceptance. The mark of them is on their foreheads from
the traces of prostration. Such is their likeness in the Torah and
their likeness in the Gospel - like as sown corn that sendeth forth its
shoot and strengtheneth it and riseth firm upon its stalk, delighting
the sowers - that He may enrage the disbelievers with (the sight of)
them. Allah hath promised,
unto such of them as believe and do good
works, forgiveness and
immense reward.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/048.qmt.html#048.029
Muslims the world over are,
"....bowing
and falling
prostrate ....seeking bounty
from Allah
....and
immense
reward."
"And
know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to
Allah,- and to the Messenger [today,
1/5 to muslim clerics], and to near relatives, orphans,
the needy, and the wayfarer......."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/008.qmt.html#008.041
another, fuller Koran translation of this
same last verse reads....
Bukhari
Volume 5, Book 59,
Number 447:
Sad said, "Kill
their men and take their women and children as
captives,"
On that the
Prophet said, "You have judged according to
Allah's Judgment,"
(the Prophet took
Rehana as his share of the booty).
In this verse, this person Rehana is a Jewess [whose husband is
among those who surrendered,
and were killed].
Muhammad 'took'
Rehana as his property, as his
part of the war booty.
The Jewish tribe of Banu Qureza
surrendered,
and as an exercise of ISLAMIC mercy,
Muhammad put 800 men
to death.
Now, what is that famous quote from the Koran, which muslims often, and
so loudly
proclaim???
After their men were systematically slaughtered, the women of the
Jewish tribe of Banu Qureza were divided as
booty, and raped.
[This account is not a
fiction, it is ISLAMIC
history. Muslims are proud of
these recorded acts of plunder.]
And of course, Muhammad 'got his', 1/5 of the spoils.
"He that serves God for money
will serve the devil for better wages."
Sir Roger L’Estrange (1616-1704)
While
we were in the Mosque, the
Prophet came out and said, "Let us go to the Jews" We went out till we
reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, "If you embrace Islam, you
will be safe. You
should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His
Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone
amongst
you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you
should know that the Earth
belongs to Allah and His
Apostle."
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/053.sbt.html#004.053.392
Quote from this last Hadith,
"If you embrace Islam,
you will be safe....", and the
contrariwise implication.
The chief pirate said,
".....you
should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle."
The implication, which has been espoused by many muslim clerics in the
UK, is that, Allah commands all muslims...
'Its yours! Take it!'
....This is incitement to 'holy' piracy, 'holy' thievery, 'holy'
brigandry!
And these actions
today
are being 'sanctified' in ISLAM,
and encouraged
by muslim
clerics in the UK, ...so long as the victims of
these crimes are
'un-believers'.
To me this is sort of incitement is reminiscent of what the
serpent said to Eve, in the
Garden
of Eden. Yes?
'You are as Gods, take it!'
And please remember, all muslims are more than willing to use violence,
to get to [the ISLAMIC] 'paradise'.
......and to get the
war booty!
[link]
All of
this ISLAMIC 'doctrine'
of 'religious' hate towards 'unbelievers', has its source in the Koran & Hadith.
What i wish to ask the leaders in our Western
communities is; Why isn't the Koran & Hadith
banned in the West, as being clear sources
of incitement, of culture
related hatred? [one very clear example
, more here
]
And why are mosques, not closed
and banned in the West, and recognised as places where *political*
hatred is inculcated,
organised, and disseminated, ....among a people who have
themselves declared, that they do not wish to integrate into the
wider
non-muslim community?
I am happy for people who [lawfully] come from muslim nations, to come
to live in Western nations, if they are willing, and happy, to
live
here, to work here, and are
willing to accept and
respect our un-ISLAMIC laws, and our un-ISLAMIC culture.
But if people [even locally
born people] cannot accept our un-ISLAMIC
laws, and our un-ISLAMIC
culture, and have no intention, of accepting our
un-ISLAMIC
laws, and an un-ISLAMIC
culture, .....then
logically,
wouldn't many of these people be
happier to move to, and to live in a
country which more closely
reflected the *politics* of their own 'world view'?
[That is, instead of following their current determination
[within non-muslim nations], of fostering
national sedition, with an intent to *politically* impose
an 'alien' culture among, and upon,
non-muslim
people.]
After all, isn't this same respect [of their own ISLAMIC 'culture'] insisted upon,
when we [non-muslims]
travel to 'ISLAMIC' nations?
Repeating [a quote, from higher on this page], a
UK
ex-muslim, who converted to Christianity declares,
describes,
muslims thus....
“They
[muslims] are such hypocrites — they want us to be
tolerant of everything they
want,
but they are
intolerant of everything about
us.”
Further....
Wake up people! ....ISLAM is not a 'religion'.
ISLAM is not a 'religion', in the sense that non-muslims
understand the word, 'religion'.
.....ISLAM is a cult
of *political* tyranny, masquerading as a religion.
ISLAM behaves
everywhere, not so much as a 'religion', as much as a
fractured 'Mafia gang' bent on
gaining exclusive influence over all of the 'local turf'. an example
on this page.
In this topsy-turvy world today....
Strangely, what is
being labelled as 'hate' by many today, is exposing the TRUTH,
about ISLAM.
Why is that
'hate'?
And why is TRUTH [accurate
information] now being called
'hate'?
A little more on war booty...
December
21, 2007
"Allah willing, we will reach
America....The eyes of the nation of Muhammad are set on Washington,
London, Moscow, Paris, Delhi, Beijing, and other countries"
.......The money in
the infidel banks is the daily bread of the mujahideen. The
convoys come from Pakistan, through Torkhan or Karachi, are the daily
bread of the mujahideen. The money in the banks in Afghanistan,
Pakistan, and elsewhere is the daily bread of the mujahideen. The
governments that use this money against the Muslims and Islam acquire
bombs and airplanes with it, in order to bomb the Muslims. Therefore, this money is
the [legitimate] booty of the Muslims.
I always tell the mujahideen
that if
they want to get money, they should beat the infidels and take their
money. You must hit them on the head and take their money. You
should rob their banks and take the money. You should take their people
prisoner, just like the Prophet did. Don't think
this is a sin, because the Prophet Muhammad himself exchanged
prisoners for ransom. There's nothing wrong with collecting money in
exchange for prisoners.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019268.php
comment at,
and some 'on topic' 'Borg' humour...
TO:
Witless Infidels
FROM: The UMMA Collective
SUBJECT: Islam Must Dominate
WE ARE UMMA.
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.
YOU WILL BE ISLAMICIZED.
Inshallah.
LAUGHTER IS IRRELEVANT.
THERE IS NO HUMOR IN ISLAM.
YOU WILL BE ISLAMICIZED.
Allahu Akhbar.
Posted by: John C at December 21, 2007
10:29 AM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019268.php#c487525
And...
December
21, 2007
Iranian official: "In a
dozen years, Europe will be an Islamic continent"
....."The
Islamisation of the European continent is imminent and this step
favours the arrival of the Mahdi," he said, referring to the 12th imam
of Shiite Islam.
Shiites believe that the Imam Mahdi,
who disppeared as an adolescent, will return to
bring an end to chaos and bring universal justice.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019270.php
If you want to see Europe's
future?
Then look at Lebanon, today, 2007.
and....
December 27, 2007
Sweden population boom!
As immigrants pour in, native Swedes
pour out. How long before Sweden becomes a Sharia state?
see also...
[link]
"Islam is peace"
i.e. A 'peaceful' world is assured
by ISLAM.
...because the peace
model 'embraced' by
muslims is, silence [kill] everyone
who opposes local ISLAMIC authority, '....It
is
the will of Allah!'
The 'muslim logic' is mind numbingly simple...
No one who is dead, has ever argued convincingly against ISLAM.
"See!......Within all Sharia jurisdictions.....ISLAM is 'peace' !"
Yes, and
principally, because quickly, any 'body' of dissenters are 'liquidated'.
And among the remaining 'sheeple' nobody dares
to
argue with the thugs
in charge!
Example, a peace loving muslim philosopher who promotes co-existence
with
non-muslims, is declared, "Apostate
of Damascus", and threatened
with death.
July
27, 2007
Syrian philosopher: Islam
must jettison dhimmi laws
Sadik Al-Azm, the "Apostate of
Damascus," says that Islam can be made compatible with democracy if it
"jettisons certain laws" -- particularly the dhimmi laws, which
institutionalize discrimination
against non-Muslims, and which most Western Muslims deny
even exist.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/017548.php
Do you believe that ISLAM may jettison its dhimmi laws?
Don't hold your breath!
someone posted this online comment....
"Could this be the
voice of a moderate Muslim?"
Yes! Sadik Al-Azm is a true Muslim
reformer. Therefore he has been condemned
by the Sunni leaders as an apostate.
In an ideal world, a person like Al-Azm would be respected and possibly
elected president of Syria instead of facing death
threats.
Posted by: Provoslavni [TypeKey
Profile Page] at July 27, 2007 5:19 PM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/017548.php#c428411
"ISLAM
is peace!"
and in this next news report, another example of the way
devout muslims [globally!]
are working to achieve the 'peace' of ISLAM!....
"....Wonder
why more peaceful Muslims don't speak out against the jihad?"
Answer;
Pretend muslims [who come to live in
the West], pretend
on the one hand that they are good muslims [to 'keep in' with their
community / family], and at the same time they pretend to their Kuffar friends that they love
liberty!
.......pretend
muslims pretend
that they love liberty [in much the very same way that the Jihadists among them do
too], ....to
remain 'invisible'.
Why would a
pretend muslim
work [fight] for
justice,
when clearly
their
heart has no courage.
To all
ex-muslims, who do
confront the ISLAMIST's, i thank you for
your
courage, ....to believe in
something!
You are worthy.
ISLAM does not, has never,
sponsored true peace [justice!] in any
society.
But rather the structure and protocols of ISLAM
are
an 'enabler' of its own specific form of terror and thuggery in a
society.
And once it is established, ISLAM is able to enforce, with little
effort, a 'silence',
effectively 'cloaking' its
corruption, criminal excesses, and repression.
And that political 'form' we
usually call, ...fascism!
see... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_fascism#Doctrine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini
"ISLAM
is peace!"...
January
7, 2008
Eight peace-seeking tribal
elders shot dead by jihadists in Pakistan
....Eight tribal leaders attempting to
broker a ceasefire in Pakistan's dangerous north-west province
have been shot dead by suspected Islamic militants in eight
separate killings.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019482.php
May
14, 2008
Afghan teacher shot dead
after speech condemning suicide bombings
Why Islamic
reform is about as likely as an attack by men from Mars, part
65320: "Afghan teacher killed after speech condemning suicide
bombings," from The Associated Press, May 14 (thanks to Jeffrey Imm):
.....KABUL, Afghanistan: A teacher
was shot to death in northern Afghanistan after he gave a speech
condemning suicide bombings, officials said Wednesday.
.....Hadi spoke at a gathering of about 700 people, including the
Kunduz governor, and was on his way
home when he was killed,
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/021017.php
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/14/asia/AS-GEN-Afghan-Teacher-Killed.php
Again, these last several news items [immediately above], demonstrate
the absence of free
and safe 'political
debate', in any society where ISLAM and its influence
predominates.
Clearly, ISLAMIC communities are places where free
'political debate' invariably 'provokes' the anger, rage,
and violence, of devout muslims.
A violence, and rage, which is often 'protected', and often
unimpeded, by those who hold political power.
See also....
What
Islam Isn't - exposing the truth, about the violent
spread of political ISLAM, in both
non-muslim
communities,
and muslim communities, around
the world.
[link]
ISLAM means 'submission', but these Shia muslims say 'No thanks!' to Allah's other
proxies!
Why?
Shouldn't these 'muslims' just submit ???
Here is, another example, of how terror is used
by muslim thugs
to achieve censorship [against self expression, and against political
expression].
And the prevailing violence, as always,
is sponsored by persons claiming to represent ISLAMIC 'ideals'...
October
17, 2007
Shi'ite tribal leaders in
Iraq warn
jihadists on the rise
Shi'ite
Islamist political parties are imposing strict Islamic rules in the
oil-producing southern provinces of Iraq and using their armed wings to
create a state of fear, a group of tribal Shi'ite leaders said.
The four tribal
leaders approached on
condition of anonymity, fearing assassination if their names or even
their home provinces were made public.
"Fear rules the
streets now," said
one of the sheikhs.
"We cannot speak
our minds, people
are not allowed to oppose them. They would immediately disappear or get
killed. The evidence of that is I am talking about it but cannot use my
name."
The irony in this story [above], is that here are one group of authoritarian muslim thugs
carping of their dread and fear, of another more powerful
group of authoritarian muslim thugs!
And some comment expressed here, at the
Jihad Watch site...
[link]
UK muslims were polled, after [52
people were slaughtered in] the
London 7/7
bombings:
"...50 per cent.....considered themselves
to be Muslim
first,
and British
second.
....25 per cent thought suicide
bombings were a legitimate
form or political
expression."
'political
expression',
example
- on this page
Terrorism: European attacks 'inevitable' as
al Qaeda influence spreads, say experts
Rome, 26 Oct. [2007]
....."The lessons are clear, this is
not a problem confined to the United Kingdom or countries engaged in
combat in Iraq, " Ayers told AKI.
"Iraq is a rallying cry but it is not the cause.
This is a
terrible clash of cultures that transcends boundaries."
.....Ayers said UK surveys of Muslims conducted after
the London bombings
showed 50
per cent of the population considered themselves to be Muslim
first, and British second. He said 25 per cent
thought suicide bombings
were a legitimate form or political expression.
"This shows that they haven't
been integrated and the sources of home grown terrorism are
people who are economically
better off. We in Europe are yet to come to grips with what we
are dealing with - fanatical Islam
is a theologically motivated movement."
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1478409734
Duh! Duh! Duh!
[link]
Assassination of Benazir Bhutto - exemplifying the relentless
nature of this evil
[note the dates, on the stories below]
Here, is what passes for 'political debate' [with the 'guilty'],
in any
society
where devout muslims predominate...
First attempt - MISSED [yet a
total of 130
people were killed in these blasts attempting to assassinate of
Benazir Bhutto - the 'guilty'
party].
"There was blood
all around and it was chaos - we didn't know where to go, what to do."
Farzana Raja
PPP spokeswoman
18
October 2007
Bhutto convoy bombs kill
dozens
At least 125
people have been killed including police and 100 wounded after
two bombs hit crowds greeting returning Pakistani ex-PM Benazir Bhutto.
....Ms
Bhutto, who was travelling from the city's airport to a rally
marking her homecoming after eight years in self-imposed exile, was not hurt.
....Several
Islamist groups, including pro-Taleban militants, had said they would
attack Ms Bhutto on her return, after she promised to confront
those operating in the northern tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7051804.stm
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018498.php
GOTCHA!!!
The Joy & 'Peace'
that ISLAM brings
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44326000/jpg/_44326171_afp203indexfire.jpg
ISLAM = = terror.
....not peace!
Violence is a form of 'legitimate' political debate, in any
society
dominated by devout muslims.
Terror
- is the objective!
Terror - is the
'method'!
Message from the Jihadists...
.....the rallying call in occupied Judea...."No
democracy for the Middle East!"
February 15, 2008
Palestinian commander:
Palestinians' war with the Jews is part of global jihad
He calls on Sunni Muslims to wage war
against the unbelievers. Unbelievers. You mean, he thinks this struggle
has something to do with religion?
'.....We reject tyrants... like those who
adhere to democracy,
socialism and secularism.'
- Al-Ghazzawi [Hamas/PA spokesman]
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019972.php#c510174
Message from the Jihadists...
.....the rallying call in Pakistan...."No
democracy for Pakistan!"
and...
Pakistani cleric: “We want
Islamic law for all Pakistan and
then the world...."
, the third item down, here
ISLAM
is a death cult,
ISLAM is not so much a
'religion', as a fractured 'Mafia gang' bent on gaining exclusive influence over
all of the
'local turf'.
"The most potent weapon of the oppressor
is the mind of the oppressed."
Steven Biko
[link]
Muslims in Amsterdam
are rioting, against religious 'oppression'.
The 'guilty' Kuffar are not
allowing muslims their freedom of religion,
A pertinent comment / observation by a
reader on the, "Immigrant youths"
rioting in Amsterdam JihadWatch page,
about the 'peace' of ISLAM [that spreads, to everywhere that
muslims go]...
October
19, 2007
"Immigrant youths" rioting
in Amsterdam
....Strange how
this is happening in all the countries that they
[muslims] adopt..
and yet no one wakes up, everyone still gives into them. As Mohammad
said, "A terrorized people are easier to conquer," On no, Mohammad
wouldn't say that he is a man of peace isn't he??? Like!!!!!
NO NO Mohammad wouldn't say to
slaughter all non Muslims when the time is right in all the world would
he, it is a religion of peace????
Thanks for a
glimpse into our future Robert.
Mind you all anyone has to do is
read the
last three quarters of the Quran and others of their holy
books to
see our future, convert or die... read it for yourself people,
and see that Robert knows what he is talking about...
Posted by: Gaye at October 20, 2007
3:53 AM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018511.php#c463858
online Koran...
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/
And
here,
an example of some Koran verses, inciting muslims to,
'hate and fight those filthy non-muslims,
who reject Allah'.
And more pertinent comment,
on the Dutch muslim
intifada,
Islamic
logic: "If
you don't let us kill you, we'll burn your cars in protest!"
And yet it all
makes perfect sense from their cultural perspective.
Posted by: special_guest at October
21, 2007 6:04 PM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018524.php#c464222
[link]
Above, frustrated 'immigrant youth',
Netherlands, 2007, Oct.
He does not realise it, but isn't
this 'immigrant youth' lucky
that he is a muslim, 'dealing' here, with non-muslim 'oppression' !
Whereas, in Iran, Sharia courts
commonly execute
those who publicly protest against Sharia law
[injustice].
Protesting against Sharia law
[injustice] - is colloquially
called 'Insulting
ISLAM'
, and that commonly means death, for the 'guilty'
people!
Also, in Iran Sharia courts execute
[duh, that means KILL] [on the 3rd
conviction] those
who [repeatedly] drink alcohol.
cited lower
on page
A policewoman in the Netherlands
who was
stabbed by a muslim man, would
not allow him to kill
her!
[She shot him dead.]
So now fellow
Jihadists [in outrage, at her self defence!]
are taking their frustrations out on local property holders.
This is TRUTH
In a different European country, but the same type of violent rage
being displayed by 'immigrant
youths'...
December 2, 2007
France stunned
by rioters’ savagery
Matthew Campbell,
Villiers-le-Bel
IN retrospect, it was not
a good idea to have left his pistol at home. Called to the scene of a
traffic accident in the Paris suburbs last Sunday, Jean-François
Illy, a regional police chief, came face to face with a mob of immigrant youths
armed with baseball bats, iron bars and shotguns.
What happened next has
sickened the nation. As Illy tried to reassure the gang that there
would be an investigation into the deaths of two teenagers whose
motorbike had just collided with a police car, he heard a
voice shouting: “Somebody must pay for this. Some pigs must die
tonight!”
The 43-year-old
commissaire realised it was time to leave, but that was not possible:
they set his car ablaze. He stood as the mob closed in on him, parrying
the first few baseball bat blows with his arms. An iron bar in
the face knocked him down.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2983714.ece
Something said of the wicked, and their fate, by the Old Testament
prophet Isaiah....
Isaiah
26:10
Let favour be shewed to the
wicked, yet will he not learn
righteousness: in the land
of uprightness will he deal unjustly, and will not behold the
majesty of the LORD.
11 LORD, when thy hand is
lifted up, they will not see: but they shall see, and be ashamed for
their envy at the people; yea, the fire of thine enemies shall devour
them.
Hmmm....
"....the fire of thine enemies shall
devour
them."
Amen!
[link]
2008 - The emergence in the UK [also
Europe, and USA???],
of no-go
areas for non-muslims
9th November 2007
Fire crews brand
streets no-go zone
Fire chiefs are
refusing to attend incidents in a part of Bradford without police
back-up after five consecutive nights of attacks on
firefighters.
A number of fires have been
deliberately started to lure crews to the Amberley Street area,
off Barkerend Road, where they have then
been stoned by gangs of youths.
......"We have had
several engines damaged after being hit with bricks in these incidents.
This an
area where we come and fit smoke alarms free of charge and give
fire safety talks. We get on very
well with the community but sadly these idiots seem intent on
causing trouble."
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/mostpopular.var.1820386.mostcommented.fire_crews_brand_streets_nogo_zone.php
Where are our leaders?
Our political, and government leaders, i mean.
We often hear their 'words'
of conciliation...
But where is their response
to this anarchy, on UK streets?
These acts of violence, by muslim
youths, are a 'set-up'.
The muslim community leaders [muslim clerics], are behind these acts.
They are planned and 'orchestrated'
acts of cultural violence, with one aim...
Terror
[fear] leads to confusion [among non-muslims].
Confusion leads
to indecision.
Indecision leads
to weakness
[wrong responses and appeasement].
Weakness leads
to political defeat.
Is this next story [below], is this just a case of 'race' conflict,
with 'whites' against 'Asian
youths',
and vise-versa?
"...'Asian
youths' in parts of Oldham [in the UK] are trying to create no go areas for
white
people."
[In the 'main stream media' [MSM] the
term 'Asian youths' ,
is a euphemism for
'violent young muslim
men'.]
6 Jan
2008
Asian Vigilantes
by Barnie Choudhury
An investigation for Today has found disturbing evidence that
Asian youths in parts of
Oldham are
trying
to create no go areas for white people.
Last year the police investigated record levels of racist attacks in
Oldham.Of the 572 cases, 60% turned out to be white victims.
Pakistanis make up the majority on the Glodwick estate just west of the
town centre.
Some youths
speak the language of racial hatred. It's not clear whether this
is bravado but
their message
is blunt... white people keep out.
Many openly admit to carrying out what they see as
revenge attacks
on white people as part of a tit-for-tat campaign.
One told us: "There are
signs all
around saying whites enter at your risk. It's a matter of
revenge. It's about giving as good as you can take."
Another had a six-inch scar running across his head.
He said he had
been attacked by a white gang.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/archive/politics/oldham1.shtml
See the next story....
Ethnic cleansing in Bradford?
Author: Rashmee Z Ahmed
Publication: The Times of India
Date: May 16, 2001
A controversial BBC report on Hindus being
driven out of the northern English city of Bradford by young Muslims in an act the Vishwa Hindu Parishad
provocatively describes as "ethnic cleansing", has evoked sharp
reactions all around.
......There seems no middle ground as
Hindus and Muslims trade charges. Bradford's
Muslims deny they are chasing
the Hindus away, while sections of the Hindu community acknowledge the
exodus was originally a matter of choice.
"We are almost like white people,"
Jiniah Parthasarthy of the VHP told The Times of India. "We have small
families, the woman works. But not Muslims. So, we are all leaving
those crowded Asian ghettos. Over the years it was our own free will. Now, some
Muslims are harassing us".
Parthasarthy, a former finance
ministry employee in Delhi, has worked in Bradford for nearly 40 years.
He believes the Hindus initially left the city to escape the dirt and
over-crowding, but
now they want to escape the "Talibanisation of Bradford, the Khalifa
movement, more than 50 mosques, 100 madrassas".
http://www.hvk.org/articles/0501/66.html
See also this
BBC story [lower
on this page]...
6
January 2008
[UK] Bishop warns of
'Islamic
areas'
Immigration, Assimilation,
Liberal Democracy, and the War on Terror.
March 3, 2006
by John Fonte
......
Let’s Examine the Issue of
Extraterritoriality for Islamist Groups Within Democratic States
There exists today hundreds of
areas within the geographical boundaries of liberal democratic
nation states in which those democracies do not exercise control and in
which the residents of those areas (overwhelming Muslim) are unable to
exercise their democratic rights. These extraterritorial
zones exist throughout Europe in France, Belgium, the
Netherlands, Sweden, Great Britain. The French and
Swedish Police call these areas “no-go zones.” Areas on the
outskirts of large cities in Paris, Marsailles, Bordeaux, Malmo,
Stockholm where the police do not go---where the police are afraid to
go.
http://acc.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=3940&pubType=ACC_Speeches
November 24, 2006
The 751 No-Go Zones of France
How bad has
it gotten in France? Daniel Pipes answers:
They go by the euphemistic term Zones
Urbaines Sensibles, or Sensitive Urban
Zones
......What are they? Those places in
France that the French state does not control. They range from
two zones in the medieval town of Carcassone to twelve in the heavily
Muslim town of Marseilles, with hardly a town in France lacking in its
ZUS. The ZUS came into existence in late 1996 and according to a 2004
estimate, nearly 5 million people live in them.
Comment: A more precise name for
these zones would be Dar al-Islam,
the place where
Muslims rule. (November 14, 2006
And where dhimmis [non-muslims] dare
not venture.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/014161.php
Search....
non-muslim no-go areas europe
http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=non-muslim+no-go+areas+europe&go=Search&mkt=en-us&scope=&FORM=LIVSOP
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=non-muslim+no-go+areas+europe&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
[link]
Another example in the UK, of a 'cultural' lunacy in Europe, and....
ISLAM's cultural
attrition taking hold in the West.
....Another example of muslims insisting on a
need for tolerance [from non-muslims],
but muslims effectively
revealing
an active intolerance [towards non-muslims, within their
own, non-muslim communities].
April
17, 2008
Multiculturalism gone wild:
UK father and son banned from public
swimming pool for not being Muslims
.....'Muslim men-only swimming'.
"I asked whether my son and I
could go as we were both male.
I was told that the session was
for
Muslims only and that we could not be admitted.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/020702.php
Just for one moment, for a different perspective of this incident, imagine if the circumstances of
this cultural incident was reversed.
i.e. Imagine the cultural outrage which would likely occur [from the
muslim community in the UK],
....if muslim
men were told they would not be permitted to use a public swimming
pool, while non-muslim men were using the pool.
This ['public swimming pool non-muslim exclusion' example ] is yet
another clear example of muslims demanding cultural separation, from
non-muslims [i.e. from all non-muslim
influences].
And this reveals, truly, how devout muslims want to exist.
In effect, the truth is, that all devout muslims wish to exercise
their own cultural
[political] paradigm [and to do this, wherever they
wish], it is called 'ISLAM', and all devout muslims wish to do
this excluding, and at the expense of
all other [un-ISLAMIC] groups of people.
And such an attitude is a reflection of the raw political
force, which ISLAM is.
Don't be fooled, despite the insistence coming from devout muslims,
ISLAM is not a 'religion' in
the sense that non-muslims understand the
word, 'religion'.
ISLAM is a political 'entity',
pure and simple.
And if you wish to know where this path will take us [non-muslims],
just look at the cultural intolerance [of all un-ISLAMIC
influences] within all muslim jurisdictions.
[link]
Koran 47:8-11
But those who reject (Allah),- for them is
destruction, and (Allah) will render their deeds astray (from
their mark).
That is because they hate the
Revelation of Allah; so He has made their deeds fruitless.
Do they not travel through the
earth, and see what was the End of those before them (who did evil)?
Allah brought utter destruction on them, and similar (fates await)
those who reject Allah.
That is because Allah is the
Protector of those who believe, but those who
reject Allah have no protector.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/047.qmt.html#047.008 - 011
see also,
A partial list of verses from
the Koran, motivating
muslim hate [Jihad] against
non-muslims, here.
[link]
The Wolves and the Sheeple - IRAN
IRAN - where the Wolves execute, and the Sheeple cower in fear.
This is what muslims intend to impose on the people of Europe [and the
world] - SHARIA
law.
Wednesday,
April 12, 2006
Cruel Islam and Iran is the
worst
.....Karim Fahimi, a Kurd, who is married with two young children, was
reportedly sentenced
to death for drinking alcohol, by a court in the city of
Sardasht, western Iran. It was at least the third time he had been
convicted of the offence: under article 174 of the Iranian Penal Code,
the penalty for consuming any intoxicant is 100 lashes; under article
179, this penalty may be handed down twice, but a third
conviction carries the death penalty...
"...In
his revealing case study, Afshari investigates how Islamic
culture and Iranian politics since the fall of the Shah have affected
human rights policy in that state. He exposes the human rights
violations committed by ruling clerics in Iran since the Revolution,
showing that Iran has behaved remarkably like other authoritarian
governments in its human rights abuses. For over two
decades, Iran has
systematically jailed, tortured, and executed dissidents without due
process of law and assassinated political opponents outside state
borders. Furthermore, like other oppressive states, Iran has
regularly
denied and countered the charges made by United Nations human rights
monitors, defending its acts as authentic cultural practices..."
http://difficultimages.blogspot.com/2006/04/cruel-islam-and-iran-is-worst.html
http://www.upenn.edu/pennpress/book/13515.html
Google
Insulting ISLAM death
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Insulting+ISLAM+death&btnG=Search&meta=
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/018486.php
and....
[link]
21 Nov
2007
Iran: 50 young
people condemned to death
for 'immorality'
[image
was
at,
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/Assets/Imgs/Geografia/Iran/IRAN%20MILITIA%20VOLUNTEERS-04--200x150.jpg]
[Comment: Is this an image of the moral, and the immoral???
Can
you sense the 'love' & 'tolerance ' in her eyes?
Here 'she'
is again, 'consoling' those about to die.]
Tehran, 21 Nov. (AKI) – Iranian
police responsible for moral crimes
have announced death sentences for 50 people in the latest clampdown on
what the authorities term as "immoral behaviour".
.......While announcing that arrests
would continue, the Iranian general said that 53 percent of those
arrested were aged between 17 and 25 years.
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=1.0.1580186303
"....condemned to death for 'immorality' "
'Immorality'?
.....in a
Sharia jurisdiction,
'immorality'
could
encompass,
- 'insulting ISLAM' [i.e. questioning the authority of muslim
clerics, to order society, children
calling a child's 'teddy bear' a common muslim name],
- persistently wearing 'Western' clothing,
- persistently listening to un-ISLAMIC
music,
- persistently not praying five times a day,
- many, many other 'moral' infringements.
see also,
Islam makes a much
better bumper sticker
than it does a
religion. (Just ask the Qurayza).
Why is it that muslims in the West,
insist that muslims are tolerant, and insist that muslims are happy to
embrace multiculturalism?
Indeed they often will, ....in the West!
But, in all Sharia jurisdictions
multiculturalism can mean DEATH, literally [even for
'nominal' muslims] !
Why?
So are muslims really
tolerant, and do muslims really
embrace multiculturalism?
No.
Such
claims
of cultural tolerance by muslims, are lies - with an intent to deceive
non-muslim communities, and with an intent to slowly build muslim political influence [cited],
within non-muslim communities.
Such lying, is all about
increasing the political and cultural power, of muslims,
within non-muslim communities, until they can impose a
Sharia jurisdiction upon all.
[link]
When non-muslims offend muslims, it is often portrayed in the
[Western] main stream media as, a 'hate crime'.
'Hate crime' #01 [calling
a teddy bear 'Mohammad']
Sudan, and the teddy bear
'incident'.
More muslim tolerance, peace and love, .....NOT.
In this Sharia jurisdiction [Sudan],
pupils [six and seven year old children] in a school 'insult ISLAM', by
deciding to call their 'teddy bear' Muhammad [which is a common muslim name], then their
non-muslim teacher is
arrested.
According to the muslim interpretation of Sharia, this woman [below]
has insulted
ISLAM, is 'insulting
Islam's Prophet', and is 'inciting
hatred'....
.....
whereas
behaviour such as
this [by
muslims],
example1,
example2,
example3,
is acceptable [behaviour, towards non-muslims].
....it is a topsy-turvy world.
What comes to mind is the phrase....
"Beauty,
is in the eyes of the beholder."
.....and it would seem that 'hatred',
similarly qualifies.
26
November 2007
'Muhammad' teddy teacher
arrested
A British schoolteacher has been
arrested in Sudan accused of insulting
Islam's Prophet, after she allowed her pupils
to name a teddy bear Muhammad.
Colleagues of Gillian Gibbons, 54,
from Liverpool, said she made an "innocent mistake" by letting the six
and seven-year-olds choose the name.
Ms Gibbons was arrested after several
parents made complaints.
The BBC has learned the charge could lead to
six months in jail, 40 lashes or a fine.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7112929.stm
update...
28
November 2007
Teacher charged over teddy
row
A British
teacher has been charged in Sudan with insulting religion, inciting
hatred and showing contempt for religious beliefs.
The Foreign Office has confirmed that
charges have been laid against Gillian Gibbons, 54, from Liverpool.
........The Muslim Council of Britain
reacted angrily to the news, saying it was "appalled" and demanded Mrs
Gibbons' immediate release.
"This is a disgraceful decision and defies common sense. There was
clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult
the Islamic faith," said Secretary-General Dr Muhammad Abdul
Bari,
........Earlier, the Sudanese Embassy in London said the situation was
a "storm in a teacup" and signalled that the teacher could be released
soon, attributing the incident to a cultural misunderstanding.
But Sudan's top
clerics have called for the full measure of the law to be used against
Mrs Gibbons and labelled her actions part of a Western plot against
Islam.
"What has
happened was not haphazard or carried out of ignorance, but rather a
calculated action and another ring in the circles of plotting against
Islam," the Sudanese Assembly of the Ulemas said in a statement.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7117430.stm
Isn't this UK muslim response interesting?...
".....The Muslim Council of Britain
reacted angrily to the news...."
Comment:
Call me cynical, but....
Is this whole
'Muhammad teddy
teacher in Sudan' episode, being exploited as another
political
'opportunity' [i.e. is it perhaps an
organised,
conspired,
muslim inter-
Ummah stunt]
enabling
UK muslims to....
- 'demonstrate' to the UK Govt.
and UK people how 'moderate' UK muslims 'really' are,
- 'demonstrate' how useful
UK muslims can be in dealing with their fellow muslims in the Ummah [to rescue this 'dumb' Kuffar woman]?
Remember both parties are muslims.
The
Sudan
'perpetrators', and the
UK 'supplicants',
are muslims.
So, why do they, the muslim
Ummah,
[apparently] have such polarised views in how to deal with a 'dumb'
Kuffar woman -
within a Sharia
jurisdiction?
Why couldn't the 'tolerant' muslims in the
Sudan, have just said,
"This
ignorant woman has committed a cultural faux pas. We understand she
made an innocent mistake.",
and excused, forgiven, her?
Dictionary
definition:
faux pas /f@U "pA;, French fo pa/
· n. (pl. same) a
social blunder.
– ORIGIN Fr., lit. false step.
Isn't this what
tolerant
people would do?
This incident, reminds me a lot of
this
story [another political 'incident', in another
Sharia
jurisdiction].
i.e. Is this whole incident a 'stunt', being staged because
Jihadist muslims
want to achieve
something, politically?
In my opinion, yes.
see also,
see also,
Teddy bear update......
Which headline do you feel is the more appropriate, accurate?...
'Death cult
adherents, call for death of
primary school teacher.'
or,
'Tolerant and peace-loving muslims, call
for the execution of
evil and fiendish primary school teacher.'
You choose.
And in this next BBC news report, the gist of it is...
'Quite
frankly, the ISLAMIC Sudanese government
doesn't give a damn, for the plight of Gillian Gibbons,
or about the international concerns
about the continuing rape, the
murder, and the pillage, of powerless people in the Sudanese province of Darfur.'
1 December 2007
Sudan leaders court Western
rage
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7122007.stm
update...
If only this Dhimmi would 'prostrate' herself, and apologise to
muslims, perhaps convert to ISLAM?
Then surely, all would be forgiven by the 'tolerant' muslims...
2
December 2007
Sudanese views differ in
teddy row
......Clearly the Sudanese Government
is coming under huge pressure internally about this case.
Some now want the government to send
Mrs Gibbons back to court. They believe the 15-day sentence for
insulting religion was too lenient and they would like her to be
re-tried.
......Some chanted threats against
the 54-year-old primary school teacher from Liverpool.
A
group of men shouted: "She must be killed by the sword."
......Some analysts believe that the
majority of people were pacified because she had got a jail term.
There's
also a large chunk of the population that feel deeply upset by what has
happened to Mrs Gibbons.
They share the sentiment voiced by
the school and Mrs Gibbons herself that this
was an innocent, unintentional mistake and that if she apologized
publicly that would be enough for them to forgive her.
.......Efforts by the British foreign
office and the two British Muslim peers who are in Khartoum on a
private mission to secure the early release of Mrs Gibbons - are under
way.
Sources
close to the Sudanese Government believe the peers have more chance of
success than official attempts by London.
.....Many believe this case is politically
motivated and that Mrs
Gibbons is a pawn in a far
wider diplomatic wrangle.
There was a strong feeling here that Friday's
protest had been carefully orchestrated. The
banners waved by marchers and tied to the front of vehicles had all
been pre-printed.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7123517.stm
and i repeat
myself....
"Call
me cynical, but....
Is this whole 'Muhammad teddy
teacher in Sudan' episode, being exploited [by muslims] as another political
'opportunity'.....?"
Reader
responses to this 'teddy bear' story at,
BBC - Have Your Say [select
not,
MOST RECENT
select, READERS
RECOMMENDED !! ]
UPDATE
- 'Released' comment.....
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=2&forumID=3883&edition=2&ttl=20071203213648&#paginator
from those comments....
[1]
Added: Monday, 3 December, 2007, 09:52 GMT 09:52 UK
"....and as British Muslim
Parliamentarians we, Baroness Warsi and myself, we feel proud
that we've been able to secure Gillian Gibbon's release." So says Lord
Ahmed. What
you've done is obtained the release of a teacher who was imprisoned
because her young pupils wanted to name a teddy bear!!! What you
should feel is great shame
that you are part of a religion that can, on occasions, stoop to such a
despicable act.
Ian, Colwyn Bay
and...
[2]
Added: Monday, 3 December, 2007, 12:10 GMT 12:10 UK
It beggars belief how many
Muslims remain untouched by terrorist outrages against innocent people,
the plight
and suffering in Dafur, yet can go completely mad over innocuous
cartoons and childrens' toys and feel an
outrage at any perceived slight or criticism. It is situations
like these that reveal
the hardened intolerance
and totaliterian
nature of Islam.
[TJLObserver], England
[link]
The potential serious consequences of this incident, on free speech and
freedom, for
non-muslims [because of the 'political correctness' being
enforced by Western politicians]...
December
3, 2007
Sudan's president pardons
Muhammad Teddy Bear teacher
....The idea that one may
legitimately be imprisoned, or lashed, or even killed for poking fun at
someone still remains.
....Once you
declare one group off-limits for critical examination, once you declare
that these people -- whoever they may be -- must at all costs not be
offended, or if they are they're perfectly within their rights to
stone, or lash, or imprison, or kill the offender, then you have
destroyed one of the foundations for free inquiry. In a free
society, people with differing opinions live together in harmony,
agreeing not to kill one another if their neighbor's opinions offend
them. If offensive speech had been prohibited in the 1770s, there would
be no United States of America, and that is one of the reasons for the
First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Whenever
offensive speech is prohibited, the tyrant's power is solidified.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019009.php
Next news item, not the
'teddy' story, but it is an 'on topic'
item....
December
2, 2007
Addled multiculturalist,
having learned nothing, renames Mohammed the Mole
......A BRITISH children’s author who
named a mole Mohammed to promote
multiculturalism has renamed it Morgan for fear of
offending Muslims.
Kes Gray,
a former advertising
executive, first
decided on his gesture of cross-cultural solidarity after
meeting Muslims in Egypt.
.....This weekend Gray said he had decided to.....rename the character
Morgan the Mole even though there had been no complaints.
.....ADDENDUM: Now that Mohammed Mole has apparently left Islam, should
he be killed as an apostate?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/018998.php
And someone's very pertinent
comment on the 'children’s author', 'mole' story.
Emphasising how well ISLAM's 'rage' tactics 'work', 'courtesy' of all
those who are
'appeasers' of cultural thugs...
"Right is only in
question between equals,
and while the strong do what
they can, the weak suffer what they must."
Thucydides (460-400 B.C.) Greek Historian
Has
Kes
Gray ['children’s author'] considered
the consequences of
his
'appeasement'?
If you 'submit' to a bully, you actually
make yourself
his slave!
Romans
6:16
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves
servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether
of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
"The word Islam
means "submission",
or the total surrender of oneself to God (Allāh)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam
[link]
When non-muslims offend muslims, it is often portrayed in the
[Western] main stream media as, a 'hate crime'.
'Hate crime' #02 ['provoking'
muslims, calling a dog 'Mohammad']
The 'Mohammed' the dog
'incident'.
January
6, 2008
"Attacking or making fun of
any religion is the same as attacking and making fun of all religions"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/MohammedDogPoster.jpg
A poster was put up near a
Somali-owned store in Lewiston, Maine. It says a dog named Mohammed has been lost, and that the dog is not
good with children and cannot be trusted. The Somali community
in Lewiston is upset (thanks to Weasel Zippers for the heads-up), and
now the rest of the community is swinging into action too, against this
possible hate
crime.
A mildly
obnoxious teasing poster is a possible hate crime?
.....When any religion is attacked, all religions are attacked, Katzir
said.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/019467.php
A very pertinent comment [below] is made at the last story post [seeing
as, ISLAM [doctrinally]
calls on
muslims to repudiate and destroy other faiths]...
When any religion is
attacked, all religions are attacked, Katzir said
Well, then,
let's censor the filthy
Qur'an, since therein Christianity (or what Muhammad was
Christianity)
is mocked
and attacked. Can I count on your suport, Rabbi?
It distresses me greatly to see
Christians being so idiotic like the ones who rushed to label this as
"hate". Go back to church, open your Bible and see hw much "hate" the
Almighty has sent towards the Canaanite belief system (which included
things that are still part of Islam).
Posted by: Crusader at January 6, 2008
10:13 AM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/019467.php#c493054
Here is a small SAMPLE
of ISLAMIC, Koran & Hadith verses inciting violence and hate,
against other faiths, and against the followers of non-muslim
faiths.
Is the endorsement and
promotion of the violent
contents of the Koran, by
muslim clerics, also hate crime ?
And if not, why not?
[link]
THIS, .....is ISLAM
The open muslim
duplicity to be found is astounding.
Yet, not a peep in the mainstream media about the blatant deceit by
muslims, when speaking to non-muslims????
Example [1 of 2] - Tailoring the 'message' to the
audience.
[....conveying 'peaceful' deceit to your
'enemy',
.....projecting ruthless thuggery [against
your 'enemy'] among your
acquaintances]
Look at
the dates on these next news reports [example 1], then look
closely at their content!
1st story...
September
23, 2007
"Death to America," "Death
to Israel" in Iranian parade as Thug-In-Chief watches
2nd story...
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says
his country is not heading for armed conflict with the US.
24 September 2007
Iran leader plays down 'US
war'
The Iranian president, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, has said that Iran is not heading for armed conflict with
the United States.
In an American television interview,
he said Iran was not on a path of war with the US and that Iran had no
need of nuclear weapons.
He is due to address the UN General Assembly in New York on Tuesday.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7009731.stm
30 x hate quotes by Iran's Ahmadinejad, on Israel,
Example
[2 of 2] - Tailoring the 'message' to the
audience.
[....conveying 'peaceful' deceit to your
'enemy',
.....projecting ruthless thuggery [against
your 'enemy'] among your
acquaintances]
February
6, 2008
PA's Message: In English – Coexist; In Arabic – Destroy Israel
Nothing new in this, of course. Arafat was a
master at it. But no matter how long the Palestinians continue
to play this game, Western politicians and diplomats seem incapable of
catching on to it -- or unwilling to do so.
By Leah Morse for Israel
National News (thanks to all who sent this in):
(IsraelNN.com) The Palestinian
Authority (PA) is delivering two very different messages to the Western
and Arab world. The message to the West, declared in English in
front of media microphones and cameras, glorifies an independent
Palestinian state coexisting peacefully beside Israel.
But according to documented
videos of PA TV programs monitored by Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), the PA is
telling its Arab audience that there will be no Israel at all,
rather one large Arab Palestine will rule the entirety of Israel.
[...] PMW Director Itamar Marcus
explains that translated speeches and interviews of Palestinian leaders
reveal their true intentions. Even "moderate" PA leaders have no
intention of actually making peace with Israel or even
recognizing its right to exist. Marcus says that hate-filled
messages are rampant in PA culture and even in children's
textbooks, which tell young minds that Islam
demands the destruction of Israel.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019825.php
Psalms
5:5
The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity.
6 Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing [deceit]
: the LORD will abhor the bloody and
deceitful man.
Psalms 7:11
God judgeth the righteous, and God is angry with the wicked every
day.
Examples of more open
muslim duplicity, when speaking to non-muslims of 'righteous',
'peaceful', ISLAM....
The use of Down's syndrome women as human bombs in crowded markets
[the bombs were remotely detonated]...
[link]
There are two 'must
see!'
images that will load with the next article...
October
1, 2007
"Islam is peace" media
campaign in UK
.......Maybe they
should be spending their money convincing
devout Muslims it's a
Religion of Peace™ rather than me."
"Muslim 'peace' adverts launched,"
from the BBC (thanks to all who sent this in):
An advertising campaign promoting
British Muslims as integrated citizens who reject extremism has been
launched.
Islam is Peace - formed after the
bombings in London in July 2005 - has initially placed adverts on the capital's buses
and Underground
trains.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018326.php
I like this idea best! [one comment
from
the article site]...
ISLAM,
.....destroy everything un-ISLAMIC, kill all
dissenters, and what is left?
...ISLAM is
PEACE [FUL]?
Two murder
incidents,
muslims call them 'honour'
killings...
Italy
Living In Italy,
this young Muslim woman thought she
was
free to live as she pleased. Her father disagreed.
Texas - USA
Remember Amina
and Sarah
This carnage below, was
the
result of a previous 'influence' campaign, made by some UK muslims.
And
here, more
muslims at 'work' influencing people.
Follow-up's at
Jihad-Watch, on
the UK
"Islam is Peace"
campaign...
Here is an initial
Robert Spencer [Jihad-Watch]
YOUTUBE
video
reply, to the UK
"Islam is Peace"
campaign...
The consensus is that, ISLAM
is still a 'PIG' !..
Some pertinent comment,
'...You
can put lipstick on a PIG, but it is still a PIG.'
and,
"Instead
of passing resolutions on Ramadam, the House should be passing
resolutions identifying
Islam as a political movement, and renounce it as a religion."
and,
"....Even
moderate Muslims are afraid of their radical brethren for they have
no religious basis to oppose them and to oppose them puts them
at risk of death. It’s a fear based ideology and it is in an expansion
mode."
[link]
Its official!...
....All those non-muslims who think that ISLAM /
devout muslims have a violent,
subversive agenda, within Western nations, are dumb 'misunderstanders'.
'The dumb Kuffar
just
don't understand peaceful
ISLAM.'
Here is the case of [just] a 'scaremongering' UK Bishop...
[link]
6
January 2008
[UK] Bishop warns of
'Islamic
areas'
Islamic extremism has turned
some
communities into no-go areas for people of a different faith or race, a
Church of England bishop has said.
The Bishop of Rochester, the Right
Reverend Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, said non-Muslims may
find it difficult to live or work in some places.
He said there was "hostility" in
those areas and described the government's multicultural policies as
divisive.
.......Muslim youth organisation The
Ramadhan Foundation said it was disturbed at the bishop's comments and urged him to
step down, saying it was against the
tolerant teachings of the
Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams.
Ibrahim Mogra, of the Muslim Council
of Britain's inter-faith relations committee, described the bishop's comments
as "alarming".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7173599.stm
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/019468.php
UPDATE of....[UK]
Bishop warns of
'Islamic areas'...
January
7, 2008
Muslims demand resignation
of Church of England bishop who spoke of "no-go" areas for non-Muslims
"John Reid should not come to a
Muslim area, we do not want to see him." -- UK jihadist Abu
Izzadeen, September 2006. The "Muslim area" in question, in which
Britain's Home Secretary was not welcome, was East London.
But now, 15 months later, we learn
that to
suggest that some Muslims hold such attitudes, and that unbelievers may
be unwelcome and unsafe in some Muslim areas, is a demonstration of
"hatred." None of these Muslim leaders, continuing their
consistent pattern of total evasion of responsibility, say anything
like, "The bishop has a point. We need to integrate more," or "We need
to be careful not to make non-Muslims feel unwelcome in predominantly
Muslim areas," or anything similar. It's all his
fault.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/019474.php
Four weeks on....
February 3, 2008
Anglican bishop under police
protection after death threats from members of the Religion of Peace
Indeed, not only are there
physical "no-go" areas, but so many areas of
thought and discourse which are made hazardous territory by
similar threats of violence. An update on this story. "British bishop
says he faces threats after comments on Islamic extremism,"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/019786.php
There is
evidence
of no-go areas [without first gaining muslim 'permission']
for non-muslims
emerging elsewhere in Europe.
One
example
in Belgium.
More, on non-muslim no-go areas [in nominally still 'non-muslim'
countries],
here
[higher on this page].
September
28, 2007
Malaysian PM: Western
nations misunderstand Islam
Badawi's problem here is that
there
are so many Muslim Misunderstanders of Islam, as we document here every
day. If there weren't so
many murders committed by Muslims who explain and justify their actions by reference
to Islamic texts and teachings, maybe Western nations wouldn't
have so much trouble grasping this glorious complexity. "Malaysia says
Western nations misunderstand Islam," from Deutsche Presse-Agentur
(thanks to the Constantinopolitan Irredentist):
New
York - Malaysia's Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi called Friday
for increasing dialogue to repair misunderstandings by the West about
Islam.
'The main cause is the misperception
in the West that Islam promotes exclusively and encourages extremism,'
Badawi said in an address to the UN General Assembly.
He said action should be taken to
generate 'greater understanding' between civilizations and cultures and
dialogue to establish 'the truth that Islam is a
religion which espouses universalism, not exclusivity, and tolerance,
not bigotry.'
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018289.php
Online comment at the same link,
Let's see now.
Infidels don't understand Islam
because they are not Muslims.
Jihadists don't understand Islam
because it's a religion of peace.
Non-jihadist Muslims don't understand
Islam because they're not out killing infidels.
With all this misunderstanding of
Islam supposedly going on why would anyone in their right mind want to
be a Muslim?
One has to conclude that only crazy
people join something that absolutely nobody seems to understand.
Mo and his god should be commended
for creating such confusion with the greatest con job the world has
ever seen and probably ever will see.
Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS [TypeKey
Profile Page] at September 28, 2007 8:32 PM
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018289.php#c456433
Next story....
An Egyptian, a muslim cleric,
an envoy of Sunni
Islam's highest seat of
learning was
arrested 'by mistake', by
police in the Philippines.
The dumb Kuffar police! [forehead
slap]
Why was this muslim cleric guy arrested anyway?
'ISLAM is peace',
right?
Well, 'An explosive
device fashioned
from a 60-millimetre mortar round and ball
bearings attached to a
timing device were recovered from
his room.'
And he was surveilled [was being watched], and a
conclusion was drawn that, "...he planned to detonate the bomb at an
undisclosed location in the city on Christmas Day."
But of course his colleagues [also muslim
clerics], now want him released,
because they know that he would never do such a thing - honest!
Dumb Philippine Kuffar police!
December
24, 2007
Philippines: "Christmas Day"
jihadist an envoy from Egypt's Al-Azhar University
......CAIRO (AFP) - An Egyptian
man held in the Philippines for allegedly
plotting a Christmas bomb attack is who an
envoy of Sunni Islam's highest seat of learning who was arrested by
mistake,
the insitution's grand imam said on Sunday.
......"The envoys of Al-Azhar
abroad are chosen according to strict criteria to encourage moderation
in Islam and the renunciation of violence and terrorism,"...
...."Sheikh Mussa is a man of
faith who represents a prestigious religious institution,"
.....Mussa, identified by
Philippine police as Mohamad Sayed, was arrested during a raid on a
flat in the Majad Islamic School in the southern city of Cotabato.
An explosive
device fashioned
from a 60-millimetre mortar round and ball bearings attached to a
timing device were recovered from his room.
Philippine police said the
Egyptian was captured after surveillance and that intelligence
reports
suggested he
planned to detonate the bomb at an undisclosed location in
the city on Christmas Day.
......Tantawi said he
hoped
Mussa would be released "within the coming couple of days" and
that the
arrest was
a mistake.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019298.php
An earlier report, same story,
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019228.php
ISLAM's
cultural attrition - against Western, non-muslim communities.
This
is how it works.
Psalms
36:1
¶<<To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David the servant of
the LORD.>> The transgression of the wicked saith within my
heart, that there is no fear
of God before his eyes.
2 For he flattereth himself in
his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful.
3 The words of his mouth are
iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good.
4 He deviseth mischief upon his
bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not
evil.
